Ethics and International Affairs 11:105–131 (1997)

Asserting that humanitarian intervention is a highly ambiguous principle, Pasic and Weiss warn of the dangers of politically driven rescues that often force trade-offs between the pursuit of rescue and political order
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1747-7093.1997.tb00020.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,393
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ethics and Intervention.Michael Joseph Smith - 1989 - Ethics and International Affairs 3:1–26.
The Moral Dilemma in the Rescue of Refugees.Ernst Tugendhat - 1995 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 62.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Empathy, Respect, and Humanitarian Intervention.Nancy Sherman - 1998 - Ethics and International Affairs 12:103–119.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

When is It Right to Rescue? A Response to Pasic and Weiss.David R. Mapel - 1997 - Ethics and International Affairs 11:145–150.
NGOs and the Humanitarian Impulse: Some Have It Right.Andrew Natsios - 1997 - Ethics and International Affairs 11:133–136.
Principles, Politics, and Humanitarian Action.Thomas G. Weiss - 1999 - Ethics and International Affairs 13:1–22.
Just Wars and Humanitarian Interventions.Rex Martin - 2005 - Journal of Social Philosophy 36 (4):439–456.
Humanitarian Military Intervention: Wars for the End of History?Clifford Orwin - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1):196-217.
Good Samaritans, Good Humanitarians.Scott M. James - 2007 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (3):238–254.


Added to PP index

Total views
38 ( #283,529 of 2,449,014 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #442,577 of 2,449,014 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes