Bioethics 24 (3):145-152 (2010)
The paper examines the ethical and legal challenges of making decisions for previously competent patients and the role of advance directives and legal representatives in light of the Oviedo Convention. The paper identifies gaps in the Convention that result in conflicting instructions in cases of a disagreement between the expressed prior wishes of a patient, and the legal representative. The authors also examine the legal and moral status of informally expressed prior wishes of patients unable to consent. The authors argue that positivist legal reasoning is insufficient for a consistent interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Convention and argue that ethical argumentation is needed to provide guidance in such cases. Based on the ethical arguments, the authors propose a way of reconciling the apparent inconsistencies in the Oviedo Convention. They advance a culturally sensitive approach to the application of the Convention at the national level. This approach understands autonomy as a broader, relational consent and emphasizes the social and cultural embeddedness of the individual. Based on their approach, the authors argue that there exists a moral obligation to respect the prior wishes of the patient even in countries without advance directives. Yet it should be left to the national legislations to determine the extent of this obligation and its concrete forms.
|Keywords||advance directives proxy for health care culture the Oviedo Convention patients unable to consent autonomy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Respect for Autonomy, Advance Directives, and Minimally Conscious State.Jukka Varelius - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (9):505-515.
Anorexia, Welfare, and the Varieties of Autonomy: Judicial Rhetoric and the Law in Practice.Mark Bratton - 2010 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 17 (2):159-162.
Respecting Autonomy Without Disclosing Information.Tom Walker - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (7):388-394.
Survey of the General Public's Attitudes Toward Advance Directives in Japan: How to Respect Patients' Preferences. [REVIEW]Hiroaki Miyata, Hiromi Shiraishi & Ichiro Kai - 2006 - BMC Medical Ethics 7 (1):1-9.
Advance Directives for Voluntary Euthanasia: A Volatile Combination?Leslie Pickering Francis - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (3):297-322.
The Value History: A Necessary Family Document.Renate G. Justin - 1987 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 8 (3).
Proxy Consent and Counterfactual Wishes.Edward Wierenga - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (4):405-416.
Advance Directives in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease; Ethical and Clinical Considerations.J. Vollmann - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):161-167.
End-of-Life Care in the 21st Century: Advance Directives in Universal Rights Discourse.Violeta Be Irević - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (3):105-112.
Added to index2010-02-02
Total downloads9 ( #459,935 of 2,164,535 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #347,995 of 2,164,535 )
How can I increase my downloads?