Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (3):176-179 (2009)
The notion of “consent” is frequently referred to as “informed consent” to emphasise the informational component of a valid consent. This article considers aspects of that informational component. One misuse of the language of informed consent is highlighted. Attention is then directed to some features of the situation in which consent would not have been offered had certain information been disclosed. It is argued that whether or not such consent is treated as sufficiently informed must, from a moral point of view, take account of four conditions. When these are applied to the operation of consent in relation to criminal responsibility for HIV transmission, the approach in some recent cases is shown to be morally questionable.
|Keywords||informed consent hiv|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Research Without Consent: Exception From and Waiver of Informed Consent in Resuscitation Research.Michelle H. Biros - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):361-369.
Prescribing Placebos Ethically: The Appeal of Negatively Informed Consent.David Shaw - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (2):97-99.
Informed Consent and Anonymous Tissue Samples: The Case of Hiv Seroprevalence Studies.Loretta M. Kopelman - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (6):525-552.
Hide-and-Seek or Show-and-Tell? Emerging Issues of Informed Consent.Leonard J. Haas - 1991 - Ethics and Behavior 1 (3):175 – 189.
On Taylor's Justification of Medical Informed Consent.Jukka Varelius - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (4):207-214.
Added to index2010-05-25
Total downloads74 ( #69,035 of 2,154,085 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #224,989 of 2,154,085 )
How can I increase my downloads?