History and Philosophy of Logic 11 (2):151-172 (1990)
Aristotle founds his modal syllogistic, like his plain syllogistic, on a small set of ?perfect? or obviously valid sylligisms. The rest he reduces to those, usually by means of modal conversion principles. These principles are open to more than one reading, however, and they are in fact invalid on one traditional reading (de re), valid on the other (de dicto). It is argued here that this way of framing the contrast is not Aristotelian, and that an interpretation involving modal copulae allows us to see how these principles, and the modal system as a whole, are to be understood in light of close and precise connections to Aristotle's essentialist metaphysics
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Aristotle's Perfect Syllogisms, Predication, and Thedictum de Omni.Richard Patterson - 1993 - Synthese 96 (3):359 - 378.
Similar books and articles
Avicenna and Tusi on the Contradiction and Conversion of the Absolute.Tony Street - 2000 - History and Philosophy of Logic 21 (1):45-56.
Peacocke’s Principle-Based Account of Modality: “Flexibility of Origins” Plus S4.Sonia Roca-Royes - 2006 - Erkenntnis 65 (3):405-426.
On the unity of modal syllogistics in Aristotle.Klaus J. Schmidt - 2008 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 13 (1):54-86.
Polarity and Inseparability: The Foundation of the Apodictic Portion of Aristotle's Modal Logic.Dwayne Raymond - 2010 - History and Philosophy of Logic 31 (3):193-218.
The Unprovability of Consistency: An Essay in Modal Logic.George Boolos - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-08-28
Total downloads28 ( #183,838 of 2,172,037 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,967 of 2,172,037 )
How can I increase my downloads?