Framework for the Analysis of Nanotechnologies’ Impacts and Ethical Acceptability: Basis of an Interdisciplinary Approach to Assessing Novel Technologies

Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (2):293-315 (2015)

Abstract
The genetically manipulated organism crisis demonstrated that technological development based solely on the law of the marketplace and State protection against serious risks to health and safety is no longer a warrant of ethical acceptability. In the first part of our paper, we critique the implicitly individualist social-acceptance model for State regulation of technology and recommend an interdisciplinary approach for comprehensive analysis of the impacts and ethical acceptability of technologies. In the second part, we present a framework for the analysis of impacts and acceptability, devised—with the goal of supporting the development of specific nanotechnological applications—by a team of researchers from various disciplines. At the conceptual level, this analytic framework is intended to make explicit those various operations required in preparing a judgement about the acceptability of technologies that have been implicit in the classical analysis of toxicological risk. On a practical level, we present a reflective tool that makes it possible to take into account all the dimensions involved and understand the reasons invoked in determining impacts, assessing them, and arriving at a judgement about acceptability
Keywords Impact assessment  Nanotechnology  Novel technologies  Risk assessment  Social acceptability
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-014-9543-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,236
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Constitutional Moments in Governing Science and Technology.Sheila Jasanoff - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):621-638.
Nanotechnology — a New Field of Ethical Inquiry?Armin Grunwald - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):187-201.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Safety, Risk Acceptability, and Morality.James A. E. Macpherson - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):377-390.
Anticipating Ethical Issues in Emerging IT.Philip A. E. Brey - 2012 - Ethics and Information Technology 14 (4):305-317.
Is There an Objective Way to Compare Research Risks?J. Rossi & R. M. Nelson - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (7):423-427.
Analogy Counterarguments and the Acceptability of Analogical Hypotheses.Cameron Shelley - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (4):477-496.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-04-13

Total views
18 ( #459,072 of 2,254,295 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #1,015,014 of 2,254,295 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature