Ratio Juris 23 (1):123-156 (2010)
In this paper I set out to read Hägerström through his own eyes, adhering to the terminology he uses in his own original work and attempting to make sense of the variance and uniformity alike that one finds in his linguistic usage. The translations we have of Hägerström's works are quite liberal, using the same word in English where the original uses different ones, and, vice versa, using different words in English where the original uses a single one in different contexts. These misleading translations of Hägerström have contributed in some measure to Hägerström's reputation for obscurity. Further, and most importantly, I will take seriously what Hägerström says about his own thought, namely, that it is dependent on that of Kant and independent of the currents of thought contemporary with Hägerström. In Section 1, I will briefly take up the problem of consciousness that Hägerström proceeds from, and will recall something that Bertrand Russell once said, in 1928, in regard to the revolt staged in the early 20th century in Europe against German idealism. In Sections 2 and 4.1, I will instead take up Kant for the purpose of clarifying Hägerström's theory of judgment as treated in Section 3. In Section 4.2, I will illustrate the difference between the notions of nothing, R-reality, and W-reality in Hägerström. In Sections 5 and 6, I will examine the analysis that Hägerström offers of the principle of contradiction, and will summarize the three types of judgment he singled out, including the type he called impossible judgment. In Section 7, I will consider Hägerström views as grounding, in a transcendental way, the presupposition of the primacy of the external spatio-temporal world, a world independent of our representations: I will consider in particular the W-real complexes that are merely represented, as well as the spatio-temporal world as the only W-real complex that is not merely represented. Finally, in Section 8, I will briefly consider some of those who have commented and translated Hägerström, this to conclude that R-reality and W-reality are coextensive but not synonymous
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1991 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Philosophy and Religion. By Axel Hagerstrom. (Allen and Unwin. 1964. Pp. 320. Price 45s.).D. Z. Phillips - 1965 - Philosophy 40 (153):257-.
Erkenntnistheoretische Vorausseteungen der spezieilen. Relativitätstheorie Einsteins.Axel Hägerström - 1946 - Theoria 12 (1-2):1-68.
Begreppet viljeförklaring på privaträttens område.Axel Hägerström - 1935 - Theoria 1 (1-2):121-138.
A Real Mind. The Life and Work of Axel Hägerström – By Patricia Mindus.Bo Petersson - 2011 - Theoria 77 (1):90-99.
Der Wirklichkeitsbegriff nach Hägerström (Verklighetsbegreppet enligt Hagerstrom). Antwort auf Anders Wedbergs Besprechung des Buches mit dem obigen Titel (Theoria X, 250-52). [REVIEW]Martin Fries - 1945 - Theoria 11 (1):71-74.
Axel Hägerström and His Early Version of Error Theory.Bo Petersson - 2011 - Theoria 77 (1):55-70.
Added to index2010-02-23
Total downloads19 ( #246,796 of 2,124,141 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #293,385 of 2,124,141 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.