The Monist 100 (3):342-356 (2017)

Lydia Patton
Virginia Tech
Ott (2009) identifies two kinds of philosophical theories about laws: top-down, and bottom-up. An influential top-down reading, exemplified by Ernst Cassirer, emphasized the ‘mere form of law’. Recent bottom-up accounts emphasize the mind-independent natures of objects as the basis of laws of nature. Stang and Pollok in turn focus on the transcendental idealist elements of Kant’s theory of matter, which leads to the question: is the essence of Kantian matter that it obeys the form of law? I argue that Kant has an independent theory of matter in the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, one that gives what Kant himself calls a ‘real definition’ of matter as a theory-independent (if not mind-independent) entity. I argue that this matter theory underpins physical arguments about inertia and impenetrability, which resemble Einstein’s arguments about the unification of fields in general relativity.
Keywords Kant  laws of nature  physics  Einstein  matter  essentialism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/monist/onx014
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant’s Proof of the Law of Inertia.Kenneth Westphal - 1995 - In H. Robinson (ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Kant Congress. Marquette University Press. pp. 413-424.
Metaphysical Foundations of Neoclassical Mechanics.Marius Stan - 2017 - In Michela Massimi & Angela Breitenbach (eds.), Kant and the Laws of Nature. Cambridge University Press. pp. 214-234.
Einstein and Kant.Friedel Weinert - 2005 - Philosophy 80 (4):585-593.
Scientific Essentialism.Brian Ellis - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.
Unity for Kant’s Natural Philosophy.Marius Stan - 2014 - Philosophy of Science 81 (3):423-443.
The Modal Status of Laws: In Defence of a Hybrid View.Tuomas E. Tahko - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (260):509-528.
The Problem of Matter's Inherent Nature.Glenn Allen Hartz - 1985 - Dissertation, Syracuse University
God and Dispositional Essentialism: An Account of the Laws of Nature.Dani Adams - 2018 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (2):293-316.


Added to PP index

Total views
128 ( #77,623 of 2,420,557 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
65 ( #11,293 of 2,420,557 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes