In K. Brad Wray (ed.), Interpreting Kuhn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (forthcoming)

Authors
Lydia Patton
Virginia Tech
Abstract
Two questions should be considered when assessing the Kantian dimensions of Kuhn’s thought. First, was Kuhn himself a Kantian? Second, did Kuhn have an influence on later Kantians and neo-Kantians? Kuhn mentioned Kant as an inspiration, and his focus on explanatory frameworks and on the conditions of knowledge appear Kantian. But Kuhn’s emphasis on learning; on activities of symbolization; on paradigms as practical, not just theoretical; and on the social and community aspects of scientific research as constitutive of scientific reasoning, are all outside the Kantian perspective. Kuhn’s admiration for Kant is tempered by his desire to understand the processes of learning, of initiation into a scientific community, of experimentation using instruments, and of persuasion, drawing on the work of familiar influences, including Piaget, Koyré, and Wittgenstein, and less familiar ones, including Langer, Demos, and Frank. Both Kuhn and Kant were interested in the question: what is the status of science, and what is the role of the scientist in its development and justification? But Kuhn presents science in a much more messy, historically contingent, and socially charged way than Kant does. The paper’s conclusion evaluates Kuhn’s reception among researchers including Richardson and Friedman, assessing the prospects for future work.
Keywords Kuhn  Kant  scientific change  neo-Kantianism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Kant's Transcendental Idealism.Henry E. Allison - 1988 - Yale University Press.
Kant and the Exact Sciences.Michael FRIEDMAN - 1992 - Harvard University Press.
The Bounds of Sense.P. Strawson - 1966 - Philosophy 42 (162):379-382.
The Essential Tension.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (4):649-652.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant, Kuhn e a racionalidade da ciência.Michael Friedman & Tradutor: Rogério Passos Severo - 2009 - Philósophos - Revista de Filosofia 14 (1):175-209.
The Philosophy of History of Science of Thomas Kuhn.Alexander Bird - 2012 - Discusiones Filosóficas 13 (21):167 - 185.
Hans Reichenbach's and C.I. Lewis's Kantian Philosophies of Science.Paul L. Franco - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 80:62-71.
TS Kuhn a teória vedeckých revolúcií.Jozef Viceník - 1997 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 4 (4):337-358.
Darwin, Kuhn, and Polanyi.Richard Henry Schmitt - 2006 - Tradition and Discovery 33 (2):49-55.
Whorfian Variations on Kantian Themes: Kuhn's Linguistic Turn.Gürol Irzik & Teo Grünberg - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (2):207-221.
The Spell of Kuhn on Psychology: An Exegetical Elixir.William O'Donohue - 1993 - Philosophical Psychology 6 (3):267 – 287.
Kant, Kuhn, and the Rationality of Science.Michael Friedman - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (2):171-90.
The Influence of James B. Conant on Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions.K. Brad Wray - 2016 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 6 (1):1-23.
Thomas Kuhn.Alexander Bird - 2000 - Routledge.
Thomas Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2008 - Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):101-115.
Kuhn, Relativism and Realism.Howard Sankey - 2018 - In Juha Saatsi (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 72-83.
Kuhn and the Genesis of the “New Historiography of Science”.J. C. Pinto de Oliveira - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):115-121.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-10-11

Total views
48 ( #206,860 of 2,403,691 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #16,507 of 2,403,691 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes