In Friedrich Stadler (ed.), Ernst Mach – Life, Work, Influence. Springer Verlag (2019)

Lydia Patton
Virginia Tech
Ernst Mach’s defense of relativist theories of motion in Die Mechanik involves a well-known criticism of Newton’s theory appealing to absolute space, and of Newton’s “bucket” experiment. Sympathetic readers (Norton 1995) and critics (Stein 1967, 1977) agree that there’s a tension in Mach’s view: he allows for some constructed scientific concepts, but not others, and some kinds of reasoning about unobserved phenomena, but not others. Following Banks (2003), I argue that this tension can be interpreted as a constructive one, springing from Mach’s approach to scientific reasoning. Mach’s “economy of science” allows for a principled distinction to be made, between natural and artificial hypothetical reasoning, and Mach defends a division of labor between the sciences in a 1903 paper for The Monist, “Space and Geometry from the Point of View of Physical Inquiry”. That division supports counterfactual reasoning in Mach’s system, something that’s long been denied is possible for him.
Keywords Mach  physics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-04378-0_26
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hypothetical Reasoning.Ernest Sosa - 1967 - Journal of Philosophy 64 (10):293-305.
Structural Counterfactuals: A Brief Introduction.Judea Pearl - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (6):977-985.
Counterfactuals and the Law.Simon Beck - 1993 - South African Journal of Philosophy 12 (3).
Looking for Routes in Mach’s Epistemology.Isabel Serra & Elisa Maia - 2018 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 74 (1):173-196.
Psychological Studies of Causal and Counterfactual Reasoning.James Woodward - 2008 - In Christoph Hoerl, Teresa McCormack & Sarah R. Beck (eds.), Understanding Counterfactuals, Understanding Causation. Oxford University Press. pp. 16.


Added to PP index

Total views
118 ( #82,046 of 2,403,033 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #15,947 of 2,403,033 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes