Philosophy and Social Criticism 48 (5):755-781 (2022)

Abstract
Over the last 20 years, biopolitics has become an established research field within the humanities and the social sciences. However, scholars agree that the academic status of biopolitics remains problematic due to the latter’s conceptual fuzziness, unmanageable scope and weak foundations. To address these issues, biopolitics theorists have engaged in reflexive efforts to convert biopolitics into a respectable discipline with a clear definition, research agenda and canon. In this article, I examine the reflexive biopolitics scholarship that has emerged in the last decade and conclude that while biopolitics may not satisfy the criteria for achieving disciplinary respectability due to the chief aporia that both underpins and undermines the academic biopolitics project – namely, its seemingly infinite reach – the structure of biopolitics matches that of experimental knowledge, also known as counterscience, the university without condition and nomad science.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1177/01914537211040251
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,130
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Empire.Michael Hardt & Antonio Negri - 2002 - Utopian Studies 13 (1):148-152.
From Biopower to Necroeconomies: Neoliberalism, Biopower and Death Economies.Fatmir Haskaj - 2018 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 44 (10):1148-1168.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Interview.Roberto Esposito & Anna Paparcone - 2006 - Diacritics 36 (2):49-56.
Biopolitics as a Critical Diagnosis.Frieder Vogelmann - 2018 - In Beverley Best, Werner Bonefeld & Chris O’Kane (eds.), Handbook of Frankfurt School Critical Theory, vol III: Contexts. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: pp. 1419–1435.
Reflexive Games in Management.Andrew Schumann - 2018 - Studia Humana 7 (1):44-52.
Digital Biopolitics : The Image of Life.F. J. Colman - 2016 - In S. E. Wilmer & Audrone Zukauskaite (eds.), Resisting biopolitics : philosophical, political and performative strategies. Abingdon, U.K: Routledge. pp. 189-201.
Foucault, Gary Becker and the Critique of Neoliberalism.David Newheiser - 2016 - Theory, Culture and Society 33 (5):3-21.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-09-24

Total views
1 ( #1,545,750 of 2,506,503 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,503 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes