Russell’s method of analysis and the axioms of mathematics
In Sandra Lapointe Christopher Pincock (ed.), Innovations in the History of Analytical Philosophy. Palgrave-Macmillan (forthcoming)
In the early 1900s, Russell began to recognize that he, and many other mathematicians, had been using assertions like the Axiom of Choice implicitly, and without explicitly proving them. In working with the Axioms of Choice, Infinity, and Reducibility, and his and Whitehead’s Multiplicative Axiom, Russell came to take the position that some axioms are necessary to recovering certain results of mathematics, but may not be proven to be true absolutely. The essay traces historical roots of, and motivations for, Russell’s method of analysis, which are intended to shed light on his view about the status of mathematical axioms. I describe the position Russell develops in consequence as “immanent logicism,” in contrast to what Irving (1989) describes as “epistemic logicism.” Immanent logicism allows Russell to avoid the logocentric predicament, and to propose a method for discovering structural relationships of dependence within mathematical theories.
|Keywords||Bertrand Russell William Jevons axioms mathematics logicism Axiom of Choice|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Aim of Russell's Early Logicism: A Reinterpretation.Anders Kraal - 2013 - Synthese 191 (7):1-18.
Russell’s Reasons for Logicism.Ian Proops - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2):267-292.
Russell on Logicism and Coherence.Conor Mayo-Wilson - 2011 - Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 31 (1).
Neo-Logicism and Russell’s Logicism.Kevin C. Klement - 2012 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 32 (127):159.
Stefano Donati. I Fondamenti Della Matematica Nel Logicismo di Bertrand Russell [the Foundations of Mathematics in the Logicism of Bertrand Russell].Gianluigi Oliveri - 2008 - Philosophia Mathematica 17 (1):109-113.
Russell on Logical Form.Francisco Gomez-Holtved - 2001 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Epistemic Logicism and Russell's Regressive Method'.A. D. Irvine - 1999 - In Bertrand Russell: Critical Assessments. Routledge. pp. 2.
The Russell Archives: Some New Light on Russell's Logicism.I. Grattan-Guinness - 1974 - Annals of Science 31 (5):387-406.
Logicism and the Philosophy of Language: Selections From Frege and Russell.Arthur Sullivan (ed.) - 2003 - Broadview Press.
Axiom of Infinity and Plato’s Third Man: As a Contribution to the Critical Appreciation of a Central Thesis in Russell’s Philosophical Logic, I Consider the Third Man Objection to Platonic Realism in the Philosophy of Mathematics, and Argue That the Third Man Infinite Regress, for Those Who Accept its Assumptions, Provides a Worthy Substitute for Whitehead and Russell’s Axiom of Infinity in Positing a Denumerably Infinite Set or Series Onto Which Other Sets, Series, and Formal Operations in the Foundations of Mathematics Can Be Mapped.Dale Jacquette - 2010 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 30 (1).
Poincaré: Mathematics & Logic & Intuition.Colin Mclarty - 1997 - Philosophia Mathematica 5 (2):97-115.
On the Deductive Strength of Various Distributivity Axioms for Boolean Algebras in Set Theory.Yasuo Kanai - 2002 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 48 (3):413-426.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2016-09-09
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?