Towards global political parties

Ethics and Global Politics 4 (2):81-102 (2011)

Authors
Heikki Patomäki
University of Helsinki
Abstract
While the transnational public sphere has existed in the Arendtian sense at least since the mid-19th century, a new kind of reflexively political global civil society emerged in the late 20th century. However, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), advocacy groups, and networks have limited agendas and legitimacy and, without the support of at least one state, limited means to realise changes. Since 2001, theWorld Social Forum (WSF) has formed a key attempt in forging links and ties of solidarity among diverse actors. Although the WSF may seem a party of opinion when defined negatively against neoliberal globalisation, imperialism, and violence, in more positive ideological terms it remains a rather incoherent collection of diverse actors; while itself defined as a mere open space. There is a quest for new forms of agency such as a world political party. Various historical predecessors of global political parties, real and imagined, provide conceptual resources, useful experiences for envisaging the structure, and function of a possible planetary partyformation. H.G. Wells’s ‘open conspiracy’ is a particularly important future-oriented leftdemocratic vision. Wells believed that only a mass movement of truly committed individuals and groups could have the power to transform the world political organisation, by creating a democratic world commonwealth. Recently, for instance, Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri have formulated similar ideas. I argue that transformative political agency presupposes a shared programme, based on common elements of a wider and deeper world-view, and willingness to engage in processes of collective will-formation in terms of democratic procedures. From this perspective, I outline a possible organisation and some substantial directions for a global political party. The point is also to respond to the criticism of existing parties and cultivate the critical-pluralist ethos of global civil society, but in terms of democratic party-formation. Keywords: Arendt; citizenship; civil society; participation; political party; republicanism; rotation; Wells; world parliament; World Social Forum (Published: 22 June 2011) Citation: Ethics & Global Politics, Vol. 4 , No. 2, 2011, pp. 81-102. DOI: 10.3402/egp.v4i2.7334
Keywords Arendt, citizenship, civil society, participation, political party, republicanism, rotation, Wells, world parliament, World Social Forum
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3402/egp.v4i2.7334
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,149
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Transnational Partisanship: Idea and Practice.Jonathan White - 2014 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (3):377-400.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Global Public Power: Thesubjectof Principles of Global Political Legitimacy.Andrew Hurrell & Terry Macdonald - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (5):553-571.
Why the Protestors Are Againstcorporate Globalization.John McMurtry - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 40 (3):201 - 205.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-08-10

Total views
18 ( #515,705 of 2,289,310 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #589,325 of 2,289,310 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature