Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (2) (1986)
The influence of physician judgment on the disclosure, competency, understanding, voluntariness, and decision aspects of informed consent for bone marrow transplantation are described. Ethical conflicts which arise from the amount and complexity of the information to be disclosed and from the barriers of limited time, patient anxiety and lack of prior relationship between patient and physician are discussed. The role of the referring physician in the decision-making is considered. Special ethical issues which arise with use of healthy related bone marrow donors are discussed, as is the physician's discretion in raising questions of competency. It is concluded that in this setting, regardless of the theoretical goals of the physician, patients appear to utilize informed consent discussions to assess their capacity to trust the physician rather than as a time to weigh the large amount of relevant data. The conscientious physician best serves the patient with recommendation of the best medical alternative rather than with attempts to remain neutral.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Western Notions of Informed Consent and Indigenous Cultures: Australian Findings at the Interface. [REVIEW]Pam McGrath & Emma Phillips - 2008 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (1):21-31.
Similar books and articles
Physicians, Battery, and the Duty to Give Informed Consent.Mark Strasser - 1987 - Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics 8 (1):40-48.
Psycholegal Issues in Sibling Bone Marrow Donation.Victoria Weisz - 1992 - Ethics and Behavior 2 (3):185 – 201.
Informed Consent: Patient Autonomy and Physician Beneficence Within Clinical Medicine. [REVIEW]Stephen Wear & Jonathan D. Moreno - 1994 - HEC Forum 6 (5):323-325.
A Linguistic Model of Informed Consent.Jan Marta - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (1):41-60.
The Practice of Empathy as a Prerequisite for Informed Consent.James E. Rosenberg & Bernard Towers - 1986 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (2).
Informed Consent Revisited: Japan and the U.S.Akira Akabayashi & Brian Taylor Slingsby - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (1):9 – 14.
Informed Consent: Patient's Right or Patient's Duty?Richard T. Hull - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (2):183-198.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #279,006 of 2,154,090 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #224,989 of 2,154,090 )
How can I increase my downloads?