A collapse of trust: Reconceptualizing the crisis of historicism

Abstract
This essay redefines the crisis of historicism as a collapse of trust. Following Friedrich Jaeger, it suggests that this crisis should be understood, not as a crisis caused by historicist methods, but as a crisis faced by the classical historicist tradition of Ranke. The "nihilism" and "moral relativism" feared by Troeltsch's generation did not primarily refer to the view that moral universals did not exist; rather, they expressed that the historical justification of bildungsbürgerliche values offered by classical historicism did no longer work. In Niklas Luhmann's vocabulary, this is to say that moral values could no longer be trusted on historical grounds. But when the "reduction of complexity" offered by classical historicism collapsed, Troeltsch's generation faced a justification problem: what other modes of justification, if any at all, were available in a time of increasing secularization and growing feelings of discontinuity with the past? In identifying the crisis of historicism with this moral justification problem, this essay helps explain why such debts of despair could be reached in the early-twentieth-century disputes over historicism.
Keywords TRUST   HISTORIOGRAPHY   HISTORICISM   RANKE   MORAL VALUES   TROELTSCH
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/187226308X268863
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,678
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Crisis Discussions in Psychology—New Historical and Philosophical Perspectives.Thomas Sturm & Annette Mülberger - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (2):425-433.
Crisis Discussions in Psychology—New Historical and Philosophical Perspectives.Thomas Sturm & Annette Mülberger - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (2):425-433.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Why We Cannot Make History. Some Remarks on a Lesson From Early Historicism.Peter Vogt - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (2):121-137.
Heidegger, Dilthey, and the Crisis of Historicism.Frank Schalow - 1997 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 71 (4):621-623.
Beyond Historicism: From Leibniz to Luhmann.Jaap den Hollander - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (2):210-225.
What is Historicism?Andrew Reynolds - 1999 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (3):275 – 287.
Why Was There a Crisis of Historicism?Allan Megill - 1997 - History and Theory 36 (3):416–429.
An Orthodox Historicism?Jack A. Bonsor - 1990 - Philosophy and Theology 4 (4):335-350.
Friedrich Meinecke: Panentheism and the Crisis of Historicism.Reinbert A. Krol - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (2):195-209.
Religion and the Crisis of Historicism: Protestant and Catholic Perspectives.Herman Paul - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (2):172-194.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

28 ( #182,985 of 2,170,068 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #345,514 of 2,170,068 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums