Aristotle's Understanding of the Relation Between Virtue and Friendship

Dissertation, Fordham University (1997)

There is intense debate among scholars studying Aristotle's "political" works regarding his understanding of the nature of happiness. While all agree that Aristotle defines happiness as the exercise of certain human virtues, there is considerable controversy as to whether the happy life involves some integration of moral and intellectual virtue, referred to as the "inclusive interpretation," or rather consists primarily in the exercise of intellectual virtue, specifically, theoretical thinking, referred to as the "contemplativist" interpretation. Through an analysis of the relation between virtue and friendship, I enter into this debate, and argue in support of the "inclusive" interpretation. ;In examining each of the virtues Aristotle identifies as candidates for "highest" or "most complete," namely, magnanimity, justice, prudence, and theoretical thinking, I argue that Aristotle depicts each, when taken in isolation from each other, as defective or limited in some sense. Aristotle's position on the need to integrate the virtues becomes clear when one envisions what kind of friend a person who embodied any one of the particular virtues would be. Although Aristotle does not provide any unambiguous solution as to how the various virtues fit together, he points toward friendship as providing the best resolution. ;One of the chief problems involved in the exercise of moral virtue, Aristotle indicates in his discussion of continence and incontinence, is experiencing the practice of moral virtue as intrinsically pleasurable. In the face of this difficulty, Aristotle suggests that the only truly pleasurable life may be one devoted to the apolitical activity of theoretical contemplation. However, in his account of friendship, Aristotle explicitly argues that friendship is necessary to happiness, and that it involves both moral and intellectual virtue. Moreover, in the context of the shared life of friends, Aristotle claims, the exercise of both moral and intellectual virtue is inherently pleasurable. Hence through examining Aristotle's account of friendship, we see that his understanding of happiness is "inclusive."
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,683
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Civic Friendship and Thin Citizenship.R. K. Bentley - 2013 - Res Publica 19 (1):5-19.
Aristotle and Kant on Self-Disclosure in Friendship.Andrea Veltman - 2004 - Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (2):225-239.
Aristotle on the Good of Virtue-Friendship.D. N. Schroeder - 1992 - History of Political Thought 13 (2):203.
The Nicomachean Ethics. Aristotle - 1951 - Penguin Books.
Aristotle on Self-Knowledge and Friendship.Zena Hitz - 2011 - Philosophers' Imprint 11:1-28.
Aristotle and the Virtues.Howard J. Curzer - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
Eudemian Ethics. Aristotle & Anthony Kenny - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Friendship and the Structure of Trust.Mark Alfano - 2016 - In Alberto Masala & Jonathan Webber (eds.), From Personality to Virtue. Oxford University Press. pp. 186-206.
The Advantages of Civic Friendship.Joyce L. Jenkins - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Research 24:459-471.


Added to PP index

Total views

Recent downloads (6 months)

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes