Epistemology, research methodology and rule 702 of the federal rules of evidence versus eva®

Journal of Business Ethics 44 (4):327 - 341 (2003)
This article questions the continued use and application of EVA® (economic value added) because it is epistemologically a non-sequitur, fails to satisfy the requirements of sound research methodology in terms of being a reliable and valid metric, and is unlikely to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. In the light of these insufficiencies, the continued use of EVA® is ethically questionable, and moreover in time is likely to result in class actions.
Keywords CAPM  cost of capital  empirical failure  EVA®  reliability  rules of evidence  validity  valuations
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1023692518377
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,472
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
29 ( #188,787 of 2,210,899 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #90,928 of 2,210,899 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature