Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (3):349-369 (2006)
In his critique of a self?interest understanding of rationality Amartya Sen appeals to notions like commitment and identity. Sen uses?identity? in an abstract sense: it refers to the conditions of rational agency. Sen's emphasis on the notion of identity finds a parallel in recent Kantian accounts, e.g. the work of Christine M. Korsgaard and Elizabeth S. Anderson. In my paper I compare Sen's account of practical rationality and identity with the Kantian accounts of practical rationality which consider the concept of practical identity as crucial for understanding the connection between rationality and morality. Sen's account, as I will show, does not follow the Kantian line altogether since Sen, unlike the Kantian accounts, does not identify the rules of rationality with the rules of morality. Sen's position, as I argue, can be read as a middle position between Humeanism on the one hand and a Kantian position on the other, and I defend such a middle position
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Humean Doubts About the Practical Justification of Morality.James Dreier - 1997 - In Garrett Cullity & Gaut Berys (eds.), Ethics and Practical Reason. Oxford Clarendon Press. pp. 81--100.
Sympathy, Commitment, and Preference.Daniel M. Hausman - 2005 - Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):33-50.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Identity, Community, and Justice: Locating Amartya Sen's Work on Identity.Mozaffar Qizilbash - 2009 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (3):251-266.
Symposium on Rationality and Commitment: Introduction.Fabienne Peter & Hans Bernhard Schmid - 2005 - Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):1-3.
Preference, Choice, and Rationality : Amartya Sen's Critique of the Theory of Rational Choice in Economics.Shatakshee Dhongde & Prasanta K. Pattanaik - 2009 - In Christopher W. Morris (ed.), Amartya Sen. Cambridge University Press.
Pluralism, Preferences, and Deliberation: A Critique of Sen's Constructive Argument for Democracy.Carlo Argenton & Enzo Rossi - 2013 - Journal of Social Philosophy 44 (2):129-145.
Why Exactly is Commitment Important for Rationality?Amartya Sen - 2005 - Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):5-14.
Against Sen Against Rawls On Justice.Evan Riley - 2011 - Indian Journal of Human Development 5 (1):211-221.
Agency and Practical Identity: A Hegelian Response to Korsgaard.Lydia Moland - 2011 - Metaphilosophy 42 (4):368-375.
A Simple Proof of Sen's Possibility Theorem on Majority Decisions.Christian Elsholtz & Christian List - 2005 - Elemente der Mathematik 60:45-56.
Social Identity Strategies in Recent Economics.John B. Davis - 2006 - Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (3):371-390.
Symposium on Amartya Sen's Philosophy: 3 Sen and Consequentialism.T. M. Scanlon - 2001 - Economics and Philosophy 17 (1):39-50.
Added to index2012-02-20
Total downloads21 ( #236,797 of 2,168,153 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,757 of 2,168,153 )
How can I increase my downloads?