Logic after Wittgenstein

Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1):43-70 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Wittgenstein's later rejection of the externalist Tractarian picture of logic according to which all rationally analysable discourse is properly understood as truth-functional rules out any conception of logic as the study of universal features of discourse. Given later references to 'the logic of our language', some conception of logic appears to survive even on Wittgenstein's later view. However, given his rejection of any conception of philosophical theory as explanatory or hypothetical, Wittgenstein seems to be forced into descriptivism. Despite these constraints, I attempt to show that a valuable account of logic consistent with Wittgenstein's critique can be identified. That possibility raises the question: can any conception of formal logic as valuable modulo natural language survive Wittgenstein's later change of heart? Taking Wittgenstein's rejection of Tractarian conceptions seriously, logic is relativised to language-games in general and, perhaps, localised to particular language-games. Looking at logic in this way opens up the possibility of uncovering inferential structures distinct from those which form the traditional logical-epistemological dichotomy. Here I outline a formal logical framework consistent with all of the foregoing points in terms of which analogues of inferential structures (traditional and non-traditional) can be constructed. Taking third-person ascriptions of psychological predicates as a testcase, I try to show that the formal framework (a system of formal dialogue) has a flexibility which augurs well for future logical investigations into linguistic practices without presupposing knowledge of the kinds of inferential structures which such investigations might reveal. Hence, my claim that the system in question represents logic after (the later) Wittgenstein

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Logic after Wittgenstein.Paul Tomassi - 2010 - Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1):43-70.
Logic and Philosophy of Logic in Wittgenstein.Sebastian Sunday Grève - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (1):168-182.
Logic and Language.David G. Stern - 1995 - In Wittgenstein on mind and language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Logic.Sebastian Sunday Grève - 2017 - In Anat Matar (ed.), Understanding Wittgenstein, Understanding Modernism. London: Bloomsbury. pp. 205-216.
Grammar and Methodology: On Wittgenstein's Later Conception of Philosophy.Hans-Johann Glock - 1989 - Dissertation, University of Oxford (United Kingdom)
Language and Logic in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.Daniele Mezzadri - 2013 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 2 (1):57-80.
The Role of the Concept of "Showing" in Wittgenstein's Philosophy.Dean Bodo Proessel - 1996 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
5 (#1,562,871)

6 months
35 (#103,417)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

心的概念の不確実性の問題.谷田 雄毅 - 2021 - Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 49 (1):1-14.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references