Neurosurgical Implants: Clinical Protocol Considerations

Abstract
As neural implants transition from engineering design and testing into human subjects research, careful consideration must be paid to the ethical elements in developing research protocols. Although these ethical aspects may be framed by the design choices of the engineering, a number of challenging choices arise. In spite of many ethical considerations for neural implant technologies being shared with generic research ethics questions, there are subsets needing special attention. Even in considerations requiring increased attention, substantial overlap can be found with research ethics questions for general medical implants and for psychiatric pharmaceuticals. The special attention to specific ethical questions in neural implants exists because of the value placed on preserving cognition and control as well as our continued memory of significant past research abuses in neurosurgery. This paper focuses on three issues of particular saliency to neural implant testing: inclusion/exclusion of subjects with psychiatric conditions, consent withdrawal of research subjects, and enhancement as a goal
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S096318010707034X
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,641
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Vulnerable Brains: Research Ethics and Neurosurgical Patients.Paul J. Ford - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37 (1):73-82.
Vulnerable Brains: Research Ethics and Neurosurgical Patients.Paul J. Ford - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (1):73-82.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Ethics in the Clinical Application of Neural Implants.Cynthia S. Kubu & Paul J. Ford - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (3):317-321.
Toward a Methodology for the Ethical Analysis of Clinical Practice.Corrado Viafora - 1999 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2 (3):283-297.
Vulnerable Brains: Research Ethics and Neurosurgical Patients.Paul J. Ford - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37 (1):73-82.
The Problem of Protocol Statements and Schlick's Concept of "Konstatierungen".Zhenming Zhai - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:15 - 23.
Cochlear Implants and the Claims of Culture? A Response to Lane and Grodin.Dena S. Davis - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (3):253-258.
A Window Into Richard M. Zaner's Clinical Ethics.Osborne P. Wiggins & John Z. Sadler - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (1):1-6.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-08-24

Total downloads

15 ( #311,080 of 2,158,107 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #89,427 of 2,158,107 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums