David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Psychology 22 (3):251-279 (2009)
Descartes argued that productivity, namely our ability to generate an unlimited number of new thoughts or ideas from previous ones, derives from a single undividable source in the human soul. Cognitive scientists, in contrast, have viewed productivity as a modular phenomenon. According to this latter view, syntactic, semantic, musical or visual productivity emerges each from their own generative engines in the human brain. Recent evidence has, however, led some authors to revitalize the Cartesian theory. According to this view, a single source or a single mechanism in the human brain produces productivity in every cognitive domain, whether in the domain of music, semantics or syntax. In this article, we will address recent evidence concerning the single source hypothesis from brain-imaging studies, linguistics, cognitive theories of music perception, biology of cognition and cognitive development, along with several objections that have been presented against this hypothesis. We formulate two versions of the Cartesian theory which combine the more recent computational theory of cognition with Descartes' view on productivity
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Allen Newell (1990). Unified Theories of Cognition. Harvard University Press.
Noam Chomsky (1995). The Minimalist Program. MIT Press.
David Hume (1739/2000). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Eran Asoulin (2016). Language as an Instrument of Thought. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 1 (1):1-23.
Eran Asoulin (2013). The Creative Aspect of Language Use and the Implications for Linguistic Science. Biolinguistics 7:228-248.
Pauli Brattico (2010). Recursion Hypothesis Considered as a Research Program for Cognitive Science. Minds and Machines 20 (2):213-241.
Similar books and articles
Gary K. Browning (2004). Rethinking R.G. Collingwood: Philosophy, Politics, and the Unity of Theory and Practice. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Hans-Johann Glock (1990). Stroud's Defence of Cartesian Scepticism -A 'Linguistic' Response. Philosophical Investigations 13 (1):44-64.
Raffaella de Rosa (2011). Rethinking the Ontology of Cartesian Essences. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (4):605 - 622.
Nicholas J. Caste (1992). Drug Testing and Productivity. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (4):301 - 306.
Terrence H. White (1984). Productivity and the Nature of Work. Journal of Business Ethics 3 (1):55 - 61.
Manolo Martinez (2013). Teleosemantics and Productivity. Philosophical Psychology 26 (1):47-68.
J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (eds.) (1996). Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Devitt (2006). Intuitions in Linguistics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (3):481-513.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads20 ( #232,682 of 1,924,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #417,923 of 1,924,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?