Social Groups, Explanation and Ontological Holism

Philosophical Papers 32 (2):193-224 (2003)
Abstract
Abstract Ontological holism is the thesis that social groups are best understood as composite material particulars. At a high level of taxonomic classification groups such as mobs, tribes and nations are the same kind of thing as organisms and artefacts. This holism is opposed by ontological individualism, which maintains that in our formal and folk social scientific discourse we only really refer to individuals and the relations in which they stand. The paper begins from the claim that ontological holism is given prima facie plausibility by the apparently ineliminable role of groups in some descriptions and explanations of the social domain. If the individualist accepts the link between indispensabilty and realism, then individualism must show that groups cannot play the role the holist requires. Three arguments are considered which aim to show that groups are indeed unfitted for this ineliminable role: the appeal to reduction-in principle, the claim that groups cannot possess the causal powers attributed to them by holism, and the view that holism is committed to the attribution of mental properties to groups. Each is rejected as a basis for undermining holism. The paper concludes that this leaves holism in a position to be articulated within a framework that supports a broadly naturalist conception of the social sciences.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/05568640309485123
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 25,057
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Word and Object.W. V. Quine - 1960 - MIT Press.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Holding Them Responsible.Paul Sheehy - 2006 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 30 (1):74–93.
Holism, Individualism, and the Units of Selection.Elliott Sober - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:93 - 121.
Physicalism and Ontological Holism.Michael Esfeld - 1999 - Metaphilosophy 30 (4):319-337.
Sharing Space: The Synchronic Identity of Social Groups.Paul Sheehy - 2006 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (2):131-148.
Ten Modes of Individualism--None of Which Works--And Their Alternatives.Mario Bunge - 2000 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (3):384-406.
Moderate Holism and the Instability Thesis.Henry Jackman - 1999 - American Philosophical Quarterly 36 (4):361-69.
Ontological Individualism Reconsidered.Brian Epstein - 2008 - Synthese 166 (1):187-213.
Is Content Holism Incoherent?Kirk A. Ludwig - 1993 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 46:173-195.
Ethical Holism and Individuals.Don E. Marietta Jr - 1988 - Environmental Ethics 10 (3):251-258.
A Critique of the Case for Semantic Holism.Michael Devitt - 1994 - Philosophical Perspectives 8:281-306.
Holism in Cartesianism and in Today's Philosophy of Physics.Michael Esfeld - 1999 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 30 (1):17-36.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-08-24

Total downloads

30 ( #162,568 of 2,126,928 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #293,382 of 2,126,928 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums