History of Political Thought 26 (1):43-89 (2005)

Paul Anthony Rahe
Hillsdale College
On the face of it, Montesquieu's Considerations on the Causes of the Greatness of the Romans and their Decline would appear to be a work of erudition and a philosophical history, and as such it has generally been read. It was never, however, intended to stand alone. It was composed as part of a larger, polemical work, akin in purpose to the Philosophical Letters of Voltaire, and it should be read in light of the other components of that work - Montesquieu's Reflections on Universal Monarchy in Europe and his Constitution of England. Had Montesquieu not been forced by fear of the censor to suppress the book he at first intended to publish, we would not now have difficulty in recognizing his little tract on the Romans as a meditation on the significance of the Duke of Marlborough's victories over Louis XIV in the War of the Spanish Succession
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,491
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Montesquieu's Natural Rights Constitutionalism.Paul A. Rahe - 2012 - Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (2):51-81.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Montesquieu's Anti-Machiavellian Machiavellianism.Paul A. Rahe - 2011 - History of European Ideas 37 (2):128-136.


Added to PP index

Total views
17 ( #577,320 of 2,381,226 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #560,102 of 2,381,226 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes