The Internal Physical State View of Sensory Experience (chapter from my book *Perception*)

In Perception (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a chapter from my book Perception (Routledge). I explain the physical state view of sensory experience (Papineau, McLaughlin, others). I criticize an argument against it based on the "transparency observation". Then I develop two alternative arguments against it. The first is a Leibniz's Law argument based on the essentially externally directed character of some experiences. The second concerns "brains in vats". Finally I consider a recent response due to David Papineau, which involves rejecting essential external directedness.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Papineau on Phenomenal Concepts. [REVIEW]Tim Crane - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):155-162.
Some Thoughts About Thinking About Consciousness.Diana Raffman - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):163-163.
Papineau on the actualist HOT theory of consciousness.Rocco J. Gennaro - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (4):581-586.
A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness.J. Kevin O’Regan & Alva Noë - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):883-917.
Papineau’s Physicalism.Helen Steward - 1996 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (3):667-672.
Is Consciousness Science Fundamentally Flawed?John Taylor - 2013 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 20 (3-4):3-4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-07

Downloads
343 (#56,382)

6 months
77 (#55,590)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Adam Pautz
Brown University

Citations of this work

Acquaintance.Matt Duncan - 2021 - Philosophy Compass 16 (3):e12727.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references