Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to set an example of how people with severe learning difficulties could be more integrated into our society. Design/methodology/approach – The installation consists of puzzles in the form of a specially designed table with an integrated touch screen. As the visual templates for the puzzles serve pictures painted by a person with severe learning difficulties. The pieces of the puzzles are manipulated directly by the player on the touch screen presenting an intuitive and easily learned user interface. Findings – The framework for the work was a creation of an interactive art installation in the form of a game where users assemble puzzles on a touch monitor, housed in a specially designed table. Paintings by a person with severe learning difficulty served as visual templates for the puzzles. The pieces of the puzzles can be manipulated directly by the user on a touch screen presenting an intuitive and easily learned user interface, which stimulates the learning of fine motor skills and encourages practice, thus making it suitable for persons with severe learning difficulties in an art therapy setting. Practical implications – As the work has the format of an interactive art installation, this enables it to gain publicity through exhibitions in art galleries. Social implications – The installation demonstrates how people with severe learning difficulties can be integrated into the broader society. At the same time, these people are encouraged to use modern computer information technology, which is becoming a necessity also for this group of users. Ethical issues regarding how this group of people can get involved in such work are also discussed. Originality/value – Combining the habituation of people with severe learning difficulties with computer technology in the form of a game, and framing the whole process as a fine art undertaking, to win the public recognition, is a novelty in addressing the needs of these people.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1108/jices-02-2014-0007
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,398
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain.Nancy M. Bailey & Betty Edwards - 1981 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 15 (2):114.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Interactive Kinds.Muhammad Ali Khalidi - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (2):335-360.
Situating Instructions.David Kirsh - 2011 - European Perspectives on Cognitive Science.
Taking Our Own Medicine: On an Experiment in Science Communication.Maja Horst - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):801-815.
Some Ontology of Interactive Art.Dominic Preston - 2014 - Philosophy and Technology 27 (2):267-278.
Interactive Constructivism in Education.Kersten Reich - 2007 - Education and Culture 23 (1):7-26.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-09-02

Total views
15 ( #653,959 of 2,420,544 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,979 of 2,420,544 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes