A Reply to Tennant

Analysis 40 (1):8 - 9 (1980)
Authors
Christopher Peacocke
Columbia University
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/40.1.8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,484
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analogues of Knowability.David DeVidi & Tim Kenyon - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (4):481 – 495.
Reply to Tennant.Colin McGinn - 1980 - Analysis 41 (3):120 - 122.
Is Every Truth Knowable? Reply to Hand and Kvanvig.N. Tennant - 2001 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (1):107 – 113.
Discussion. Changing the Theory of Theory Change: Reply to My Critics.N. Tennant - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):569-586.
The Emperor's New Concepts.Neil Tennant - 2002 - Noûs 36 (s16):345-377.
Changing the Theory of Theory Change: Reply to My Critics.Neil Tennant - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):569-586.
How Not to Change the Theory of Theory Change: A Reply to Tennant.Sven Ove Hansson & Hans Rott - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (3):361-380.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-05-29

Total downloads
77 ( #81,173 of 2,268,045 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #145,157 of 2,268,045 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature