Counterpossible Dependence and the Efficacy of the Divine Will

Faith and Philosophy 34 (1):3-16 (2017)

Authors
Kenneth L. Pearce
Trinity College, Dublin
Abstract
The will of an omnipotent being would be perfectly efficacious. Alexander Pruss and I have provided an analysis of perfect efficacy that relies on non-trivial counterpossible conditionals. Scott Hill has objected that not all of the required counterpossibles are true of God. Sarah Adams has objected that perfect efficacy of will (on any analysis) would be an extrinsic property and so is not suitable as a divine attribute. I argue that both of these objections can be answered if the divine will is taken to be the ground, rather than the cause, of its fulfillment.
Keywords omnipotence  counterpossible  grounding
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
ISBN(s) 0739-7046
DOI 10.5840/faithphil20171573
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 49,066
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No Work for a Theory of Grounding.Jessica M. Wilson - 2014 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 57 (5-6):535-579.
Guide to Ground.Kit Fine - 2012 - In Fabrice Correia & Benjamin Schnieder (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding. Cambridge University Press. pp. 37--80.
On What Grounds What.Jonathan Schaffer - 2009 - In David Manley, David J. Chalmers & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 347-383.
The Question of Realism.Kit Fine - 2001 - Philosophers' Imprint 1:1-30.
A Clarification and Defense of the Notion of Grounding.Paul Audi - 2012 - In Fabrice Correia & Benjamin Schnieder (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge University Press. pp. 101-121.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Philosophy of Filioque.Nikk Effingham - 2018 - Religious Studies 54 (3):297-312.
Are We Free to Break the Laws of Providence?Kenneth L. Pearce - forthcoming - Faith and Philosophy 37.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Grounding Entails Counterpossible Non‐Triviality.Alastair Wilson - 2016 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92 (3):716-728.
Understanding Omnipotence.Kenneth L. Pearce & Alexander R. Pruss - 2012 - Religious Studies 48 (3):403-414.
New Puzzles About Divine Attributes.Moti Mizrahi - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (2):147-157.
A New Paradox of Omnipotence.Sarah Adams - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (3):759-785.
Omnipotence.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2011 - The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Omnipotence.Graham Oppy - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):58–84.
Two Omnipotent Beings?Aldo Frigerio & Ciro Florio - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (2):309-324.
On Counterpossibles.Jens Christian Bjerring - 2013 - Philosophical Studies (2):1-27.
Impossible Worlds.Ira Kiourti - 2012 - Oxford Bibliographies in Philosophy.
Omnipotence Again.Erik J. Wielenberg - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (1):26-47.
Who's Afraid of Impossible Worlds?Edwin D. Mares - 1997 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (4):516-526.
The Divine Attributes.Nicholas Everitt - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (1):78-90.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-09-15

Total views
82 ( #110,381 of 2,311,213 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #350,742 of 2,311,213 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature