First person illusions: Are they Descartes', or Kant's?

Philosophical Perspectives 26 (1):247-275 (2012)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/phpe.12006
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,628
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Brainstorms.Daniel C. Dennett - 1978 - MIT Press.
Origins of Objectivity.Tyler Burge - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Mind and World.John McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
What is It Like to Be a Bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Descartes and First Person Authority.Steven L. Reynolds - 1992 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 9 (2):181-189.
Descartes Defended.Christopher Peacocke - 2012 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 86 (1):109-125.
Persons, Animals, and Bodies.William S. Larkin - 2004 - Southwest Philosophy Review 20 (2):95-116.
A Note on Descartes and Spinoza.Jonathan Bennett - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (3):379-380.
Cartesian Realism and G/P-Implosion.Mark Glouberman - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Research 23:307-329.
Theory-Laden Experience and Illusions.Terence Rajivan Edward - 2011 - Ethos: Dialogues in Philosophy and Social Sciences 4 (2):58-67.
The Illusions of Scientists Vs. The Illusions of Social Epistemologists.E. C. - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):343-351.
Can Feminists Be Cartesians?Brie Gertler - 2002 - Dialogue 41 (1):91-112.
The Illusions of Scientists Vs. The Illusions of Social Epistemologists.Carlos E. Vasco - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):343-351.
Added to PP index
2012-12-22

Total downloads
50 ( #119,829 of 2,235,946 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #193,482 of 2,235,946 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature