First person illusions: Are they Descartes', or Kant's?

Philosophical Perspectives 26 (1):247-275 (2012)
Authors
Christopher Peacocke
Columbia University
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/phpe.12006
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,023
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Brainstorms.Daniel C. Dennett - 1978 - MIT Press.
Origins of Objectivity.Tyler Burge - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Mind and World.John McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
What is It Like to Be a Bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Descartes and First Person Authority.Steven L. Reynolds - 1992 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 9 (2):181-189.
Descartes Defended.Christopher Peacocke - 2012 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 86 (1):109-125.
Persons, Animals, and Bodies.William S. Larkin - 2004 - Southwest Philosophy Review 20 (2):95-116.
A Note on Descartes and Spinoza.Jonathan Bennett - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (3):379-380.
Cartesian Realism and G/P-Implosion.Mark Glouberman - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Research 23:307-329.
Theory-Laden Experience and Illusions.Terence Rajivan Edward - 2011 - Ethos: Dialogues in Philosophy and Social Sciences 4 (2):58-67.
The Illusions of Scientists Vs. The Illusions of Social Epistemologists.E. C. - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):343-351.
Can Feminists Be Cartesians?Brie Gertler - 2002 - Dialogue 41 (1):91-112.
The Illusions of Scientists Vs. The Illusions of Social Epistemologists.Carlos E. Vasco - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):343-351.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-12-22

Total downloads
50 ( #125,599 of 2,275,405 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #375,441 of 2,275,405 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature