Genetic Integrity, Conservation Biology and the Ethics of Non-Intervention

Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):259-261 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Yasha Rohwer and Emma Marris argue there is no prima facie duty to preserve genetic integrity; they contend, rather, that preserving the integrity of specific genomes is only a mean...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,290

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Erratum.[author unknown] - 2016 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 19 (1):118-118.
On the Intrinsic Value of Genetic Integrity.Attila Tanyi - 2015 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):248-251.
Genetic Integrity and the Very Idea of a Prima Facie Duty.Kevin Meeker - 2015 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):256-258.
Nature’s Legacy: On Rohwer and Marris and Genomic Conservation.Richard Christian - 2015 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):265-267.
Genetic Integrity, Authenticity, and Aesthetic Worth.Shlomo Cohen - 2015 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):271-274.
‘Attack of the Hybrid Swarm?’.Jennifer Welchman - 2015 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):252-255.
Perspectives on Ecological Integrity.Laura Westra & John Lemons - 1999 - Environmental Values 8 (1):116-118.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-13

Downloads
55 (#387,113)

6 months
10 (#379,980)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

David M. Pena-Guzman
San Francisco State University
Gabrielle Guzman
Colgate University

Citations of this work

Erratum.[author unknown] - 2016 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 19 (1):118-118.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Right and the Good.Philip Stratton-Lake (ed.) - 2002 - Oxford, GB: Clarendon Press.

Add more references