Religious Studies 24 (4):483 - 495 (1988)
AbstractRecently there have been in the journals a large number of papers on miracles. The issue debated centred on whether miracles, as violations of natural law by a deity, are possible. Alstair McKinnon, George D. Chryssides and P. S. Wadia contend that the concept of a violation of natural law is defective. Others like Guy Robinson and Malcolm Diamonds claim that the acceptance of miracles constitutes a challenge to scientific autonomy. There have also been defenders of miracles, to name just a few: R. F. Holland, Richard Swinburne and R. C. Wallace. What is, however, overlooked in these polemical discussions is whether theist religions require miracles, and if they do, whether the concept of a miracle required is that of a violation of a law of nature by God. In the present paper I shall argue for an affirmative response to both questions
Similar books and articles
Miracles: The Case for Theism.Leon Pearl - 1988 - American Philosophical Quarterly 25 (4):331 - 337.
Miracles and the case for theism.Victor Reppert - 1989 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 25 (1):35 - 51.
Miracles, evidence and theism: A further apologia.Robert Lamer - 1994 - Sophia 33 (1):51-57.
Mackie's treatment of miracles.Richard Otte - 1996 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 39 (3):151-158.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Religious Belief and Religious Skepticism.Gary Gutting - 1984 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 15 (1):94-95.
Discourse on Metaphysics.G. W. Leibniz, Peter G. Lucas & Leslie Grint - 1955 - Philosophy 30 (112):81-84.