In Stefan Storrie (ed.), Berkeley's Three Dialogues: New Essays. Oxford University Press (forthcoming)
In the Preface to the Three Dialogues<, Berkeley says that one of his main aims is to refute the free-thinkers. Puzzlingly, however, we are then treated to a dialogue between two Christians in which the free-thinkers never reappear. This is related to a second, more general puzzle about Berkeley's religious polemics: although Berkeley says he is defending orthodox conclusions, he also reminds himself in his notebooks "To use the utmost Caution not to give the least Handle of offence to the Church or Church-men." What is Berkeley worried about? Both of these puzzles are solved by the recognition that the argument against matter in the Three Dialogues is patterned after an argument for atheism that Berkeley attributed to Anthony Collins. Berkeley's aim is thus to use the free-thinkers' own premises and arguments against them. In doing this, however, he rejects doctrines many churchmen held dear -- most notably, the doctrine of divine analogy.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Berkeley, God, and Explanation.Douglas M. Jesseph - 2005 - In Christia Mercer (ed.), Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter, and Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Berkeley's World: An Examination of the Three Dialogues.Tom Stoneham - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Berkeley's Epistemic Ontology : The Three Dialogues.Daniel Flage - 2008 - In Stephen H. Daniel (ed.), New Interpretations of Berkeley's Thought. Humanity Books.
Principles of Human Knowledge ; and, Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous.George Berkeley - 1988 - Penguin Books.
Principles of Human Knowledge and Three Dialogues.George Berkeley - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
Berkeley and the Argument From Conceiving.Robert Frederick - 1987 - Philosophy Research Archives 13:481-487.
Berkeley on the Numerical Identity of What Several Immediately Perceive (Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous III 247-8). [REVIEW]Richard Glauser - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (8):517-530.
Berkeley's Case Against Realism About Dynamics.Lisa Downing - 1995 - In Robert G. Muehlmann (ed.), Berkeley's Metaphysics: Structural, Interpretive, and Critical Essays. The Pennsylvania State University Press. pp. 197--214.
Added to index2015-03-25
Total downloads35 ( #140,652 of 2,143,791 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #227,273 of 2,143,791 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.