In Stefan Storrie (ed.), Berkeley's Three Dialogues: New Essays. Oxford University Press (2018)

Authors
Kenneth L. Pearce
Trinity College, Dublin
Abstract
In the Preface to the Three Dialogues<, Berkeley says that one of his main aims is to refute the free-thinkers. Puzzlingly, however, we are then treated to a dialogue between two Christians in which the free-thinkers never reappear. This is related to a second, more general puzzle about Berkeley's religious polemics: although Berkeley says he is defending orthodox conclusions, he also reminds himself in his notebooks "To use the utmost Caution not to give the least Handle of offence to the Church or Church-men." What is Berkeley worried about? Both of these puzzles are solved by the recognition that the argument against matter in the Three Dialogues is patterned after an argument for atheism that Berkeley attributed to Anthony Collins. Berkeley's aim is thus to use the free-thinkers' own premises and arguments against them. In doing this, however, he rejects doctrines many churchmen held dear -- most notably, the doctrine of divine analogy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,437
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Berkeley: An Interpretation.Kenneth P. Winkler - 1989 - Oxford University Press UK.
Berkeley’s World: An Examination of the Three Dialogues.Tom Stoneham - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (217):629-631.
Berkeley's Rejection of Divine Analogy.Stephen H. Daniel - 2011 - Science Et Esprit 63 (2):149-161.
Reexamining Berkeley's Philosophy.Stephen H. Daniel (ed.) - 2007 - University of Toronto Press.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Two Routes to Idealism: Collier and Berkeley.David Bartha - 2020 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 28 (6):1071-1093.
Peter Browne on the Metaphysics of Knowledge.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2020 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 88:215-237.
The Irish Context of Berkeley's 'Resemblance Thesis'.Peter West & Manuel Fasko - 2020 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 88:7-31.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Berkeley's Ambiguity.David A. Givner - 1970 - Dialogue 8 (4):646-662.
Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous.George Berkeley (ed.) - 1713 - Oxford University Press.
Nonsense and Illusions of Thought.Herman Cappelen - 2013 - Philosophical Perspectives 27 (1):22-50.
Principles of Human Knowledge and Three Dialogues.George Berkeley (ed.) - 1710/1988 - Oxford University Press.
Berkeley and the Argument From Conceiving.Robert Frederick - 1987 - Philosophy Research Archives 13:481-487.
Berkeley's Case Against Realism About Dynamics.Lisa Downing - 1995 - In Robert G. Muehlmann (ed.), Berkeley's Metaphysics: Structural, Interpretive, and Critical Essays. The Pennsylvania State University Press. pp. 197--214.
Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous.Jonathan Dancy (ed.) - 1998 - Oxford University Press.
Berkeley’s Lockean Religious Epistemology.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2014 - Journal of the History of Ideas 75 (3):417-438.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-03-25

Total views
64 ( #158,292 of 2,420,984 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #152,508 of 2,420,984 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes