Social Epistemology 23 (2):105 – 124 (2009)
Despite its proliferation in technology studies, the concept of “path dependence” has scarcely been applied to epistemology. In this essay, I investigate path dependence in the production of scientific knowledge, first, by considering Kuhn's scattered remarks that lend support to a path-dependence thesis (Section I) and second by developing and criticising Kuhn's embryonic account (Sections II and III). I examine a case from high-energy physics that brings the path-dependent nature of scientific knowledge to the fore and I pay attention to two sources of path dependence—“theoretical” and “instrumental”. The latter source is particularly important in “big science”. I ask in Section IV whether path dependence in scientific knowledge can lead to circumstances like those in the technological field, in which a theory can come to dominate a scientific speciality even though it is inferior to alternatives. In Section V, I ask what implications my thesis has for science policy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge University Press.
Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times.Steve Fuller - 2001 - University of Chicago Press.
The Essential Tension.T. S. Kuhn - 1980 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31 (4):359-375.
The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences.Ian Hacking - 1992 - In Andrew Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture. University of Chicago Press. pp. 29--64.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A Model of Path-Dependence in Decisions Over Multiple Propositions.Christian List - 2004 - American Political Science Review 98 (3):495-513.
Must Scientific Diagrams Be Eliminable? The Case of Path Analysis.James R. Griesemer - 1991 - Biology and Philosophy 6 (2):155-180.
Tibetan Yoga and Secret Doctrines.W. Y. Evans-Wentz - 1968 - New York [Etc.], Oxford University Press.
Reflections on Path Dependence and Irreversibility: Lessons From Evolutionary Biology.Eric Desjardins - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (5):724-738.
“Intrinsically” or Just “Instrumentally” Valuable? On Structural Types of Values of Scientific Knowledge.Peter P. Kirschenmann - 2001 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 32 (2):237-256.
Puzzles and Problems.Juan Urrutia Elejalde - 2008 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):49-70.
Dependence Logic: A New Approach to Independence Friendly Logic.J. Väänänen - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
Rousseau on Dependence and the Formation of Political Society.David James - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):343-366.
The Missing Link Between the Theory and Empirics of Path Dependence: Conceptual Clarification, Testability Issue, Methodological Implications.Jean-Philippe Vergne & Rodolphe Durand - 2010 - Journal of Management Studies 47:736-759.
Added to index2010-05-07
Total downloads26 ( #198,233 of 2,177,981 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,027 of 2,177,981 )
How can I increase my downloads?