Journal of Business Ethics 31 (4):341 - 353 (2001)

What follows is a dialogue, in the Platonic sense, concerning the justifications for "business ethics" as a vehicle for asking questions about the values of modern business organisations. The protagonists are the authors, Gordon Pearson – a pragmatist and sceptic where business ethics is concerned – and Martin Parker – a sociologist and idealist who wishes to be able to ask ethical questions of business. By the end of the dialogue we come to no agreement on the necessity or justification for business ethics, but on the way discuss the uses of philosophy, the meanings of integrity and trust, McDonald''s, a hypothetical torture manufacturer and various other matters.
Keywords academics  business  dialogue  ethics  managers  McDonald's  integrity  politics  trust  Weber
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1010759312535
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,759
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Management or Organizing? A Dialogue.Gordon Pearson & Martin Parker - 2008 - Business and Society Review 113 (1):43-61.
What Should Business Schools Teach Managers?Martin Parker & Gordon Pearson - 2013 - Business and Society Review 118 (1):1-22.
What Should Business Schools Teach Managers?Gordon Pearson Martin Parker - 2013 - Business and Society Review 118 (1):1-22.
Is Small Always Beautiful? A Dialogue.Gordon Pearson & Martin Parker - 2016 - Business and Society Review 121 (4):549-567.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
48 ( #215,158 of 2,432,605 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #465,136 of 2,432,605 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes