Religious Studies 48 (3):403-414 (2012)
An omnipotent being would be a being whose power was unlimited. The power of human beings is limited in two distinct ways: we are limited with respect to our freedom of will, and we are limited in our ability to execute what we have willed. These two distinct sources of limitation suggest a simple definition of omnipotence: an omnipotent being is one that has both perfect freedom of will and perfect efficacy of will. In this paper we further explicate this definition and show that it escapes the standard objections to divine omnipotence.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Omniscience and Omnipotence: How They May Help - or Hurt - in a Game.Steven J. Brams - 1982 - Inquiry 25 (2):217 – 231.
Are Omnipotence and Necessary Moral Perfection Compatible? Reply to Mawson.Wes Morriston - 2003 - Religious Studies 39 (4):441-449.
How the Divine Properties Fit Together: Reply to Gwiazda.Richard Swinburne - 2009 - Religious Studies 45 (4):495-498.
A New Cosmological Argument.Richard M. Gale & Alexander R. Pruss - 1999 - Religious Studies 35 (4):461-476.
Unknowable Truths and the Doctrine of Omniscience.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 1989 - Journal of the American Academy of Religion 57:485-507.
Added to index2011-12-05
Total downloads130 ( #34,250 of 2,072,317 )
Recent downloads (6 months)16 ( #38,032 of 2,072,317 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.