What Descartes Doubted, Berkeley Denied, and Kant Endorsed

Dialogue:1-33 (forthcoming)
Abstract
According to Kant, there is some doctrine, which he sometimes calls 'empirical realism,' such that it was doubted by Descartes, denied by Berkeley, and endorsed by Kant himself. It may be doubted whether there really is such a doctrine or, if there is, whether it takes the form Kant seems to say it does. For instance, if empirical realism is taken as the assertion that familiar objects like tables and chairs exist, then this doctrine was neither seriously doubted by Descartes, nor denied by Berkeley. If empirical realism is the view that such objects are mind-independent, then it was clearly denied by Berkeley, but was neither seriously doubted by Descartes, nor straightforwardly endorsed by Kant. Kant's assertion thus presents us with a puzzle: what might empirical realism be? The primary aim of this paper will be to reconstruct Kant's own narrative of the historical relationship between Descartes, Berkeley, and himself, in order to identify the doctrine Kant calls 'empirical realism.' I argue that the empirical realism which Descartes doubted, Berkeley denied, and Kant endorsed is the doctrine that the concept of extended substance has legitimate application.
Keywords Immanuel Kant  Rene Descartes  George Berkeley  empirical realism  substance  extension
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0012217317000981
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,607
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Kant's Idealism and the Secondary Quality Analogy.Lucy Allais - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):459-484.
Kant's Refutation of Idealism.Georges Dicker - 2008 - Noûs 42 (1):80–108.
Two Perspectives on Kant's Appearances and Things in Themselves.Hoke Robinson - 1994 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (3):411-441.
Kant's Refutation of Dogmatic Idealism.Colin M. Turbayne - 1955 - Philosophical Quarterly 5 (20):225-244.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Descartes and Berkeley on Mind: The Fourth Distinction.Walter Ott - 2006 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (3):437 – 450.
Cartesian Realism and G/P-Implosion.Mark Glouberman - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Research 23:307-329.
Kant's Empirical Realism.Paul Abela - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Descartes em Kant.Luciano Codato - 2009 - Discurso 39 (39):195-222.
The Cartesian Context of Berkeley's Attack on Abstraction.Walter R. Ott - 2004 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4):407–424.
Added to PP index
2016-09-28

Total downloads
49 ( #122,197 of 2,235,741 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #82,485 of 2,235,741 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature