Topics in Cognitive Science 10 (3):501-517 (2018)
AbstractTo explain how abstract concepts are grounded in sensory-motor experiences, several theories have been proposed. I will discuss two of these proposals, Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Situated Cognition, and argue why they do not fully explain grounding. A central idea in Conceptual Metaphor Theory is that image schemas ground abstract concepts in concrete experiences. Image schemas might themselves be abstractions, however, and therefore do not solve the grounding problem. Moreover, image schemas are too simple to explain the full richness of abstract concepts. Situated cognition might provide such richness. Research in our laboratory, however, has shown that even for concrete concepts, sensory-motor grounding is task dependent. Therefore, it is questionable whether abstract concepts can be significantly grounded in sensory-motor processing.
Similar books and articles
A New Approach to the Grounding of Abstract Concepts.Tim Seuchter - 2011 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):63.
Grounding Action Representations.Arne M. Weber & Gottfried Vosgerau - 2012 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (1):53-69.
The Brain's Concepts: The Role of the Sensory-Motor System in Conceptual Knowledge.Vittorio Gallese & George Lakoff - 2007 - Cognitive Neuropsychology 22 (3-4):455-479.
The Use of Concrete and Abstract Concepts by Children and Adults.R. Miller - 1973 - Cognition 2 (1):49-58.
Are There Any Situated Cognition Concepts of Memory Functioning as Investigative Kinds in the Sciences of Memory?Ruth Hibbert - 2015 - Dissertation, University of Kent
Embodied Cognition: Grounded Until Further Notice?Cory Wright - 2008 - British Journal of Psychology 99:157-164.
In Defence of Embodied Cognition: A Reply to Fred Adams.Christopher Letheby - 2012 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11 (3):403-414.
Reading Semantic Cognition as a Theory of Concepts.Jesse Snedeker - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):727-728.
Images Schemas in Conceptual Development: What Happened to the Body?Raymond W. Gibbs - 2008 - Philosophical Psychology 21 (2):231-239.
Being-in-the-World-With: Presence Meets Social and Cognitive Neuroscience.Prof G. Riva - 2006 - In Riva, Prof. G. (2006) Being-in-the-World-With: Presence Meets Social and Cognitive Neuroscience. [Book Chapter].
Metaphor and Meaning in Early China.Edward Slingerland - 2011 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (1):1-30.
Are Automatic Conceptual Cores the Gold Standard of Semantic Processing? The Context‐Dependence of Spatial Meaning in Grounded Congruency Effects.Lauren A. M. Lebois, Christine D. Wilson-Mendenhall & Lawrence W. Barsalou - 2015 - Cognitive Science 39 (8):1764-1801.
Congruity Effects in Time and Space: Behavioral and ERP Measures.Ursina Teuscher, Marguerite McQuire, Jennifer Collins & Seana Coulson - 2008 - Cognitive Science 32 (3):563-578.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Overcoming the Modal/Amodal Dichotomy of Concepts.Christian Michel - 2021 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 20 (4):655-677.
Editors' Introduction: Abstract Concepts: Structure, Processing, and Modeling.Marianna Bolognesi & Gerard Steen - 2018 - Topics in Cognitive Science 10 (3):490-500.
The Allocation of Valenced Percepts Onto 3D Space.Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos, Artin Arshamian, Carlos Tirado, Raydonal Ospina & Maria Larsson - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
A Hybrid Account of Concepts Within the Predictive Processing Paradigm.Christian Michel - forthcoming - Review of Philosophy and Psychology:1-27.
Effects of Social Experience on Abstract Concepts in Semantic Priming.Zhao Yao, Yu Chai, Peiying Yang, Rong Zhao & Fei Wang - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
References found in this work
Perceptual Symbol Systems.Lawrence W. Barsalou - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):577-660.
What Memory is For: Creating Meaning in the Service of Action.Arthur M. Glenberg - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):1-19.
The Neurobiology of Semantic Memory.Jeffrey R. Binder & Rutvik H. Desai - 2011 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (11):527-536.