Feminist Perspectives in Medicine and Bioethics

In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 836-849 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Accession Number: ATLA0001713191; Hosting Book Page Citation: p 836-849.; Language(s): English; General Note: Bibliography: p 849.; Issued by ATLA: 20130825; Publication Type: Essay

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2008, 2009

ISBN(s)

0199279276

DOI

10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199543656.003.0050

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Going Public: Feminist Epistemologies, Hannah Arendt, and the Science and Religion Discourse.Lisa L. Stenmark - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 821-835.
Relations between Homo sapiens and Other Animals: Scientific and Religious Arguments.Nancy R. Howell - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 945-961.
Feminist bioethics and psychiatry.Norah Martin - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (4):431 – 441.
Psychology, the human sciences, and religion.Raymond F. Paloutzian - 2006 - In Philip Clayton & Zachory Simpson (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 236--252.
The philosophy and practice of medicine and bioethics: a naturalistic-humanistic approach.Warren A. Shibles - 2010 - London: Springer. Edited by Barbara Maier.
Normality and naturalness: A comparison of the meanings of concepts used within veterinary medicine and human medicine. [REVIEW]Henrik Lerner & Bjørn Hofmann - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (6):403-412.
Trinitarian Faith Seeking Transformative Understanding.F. LeRon Shults - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 488-502.
Why reading the title isn’t good enough: An evaluation of the 4S approach to evidence-based medicine.Kirstin Borgerson - 2009 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (2):152-175.
Science, Ethics, and the Human Spirit.William B. Hurlbut - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 872-887.
Feminist Perspectives in Medical Ethics.Helen B. Holmes & Laura Martha Purdy (eds.) - 1992 - Indiana University Press.
The concept of a feminist bioethics.Mary C. Rawlinson - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (4):405 – 416.
Hinduism and Science.Sangeetha Menon - 2006 - In Philip Clayton & Zachory Simpson (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 7-23.
Ground-of-Being Theologies.Wesley J. Wildman - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 612-632.
The Potential of Panentheism for Dialogue between Science and Religion.Michael Brierley - 2006 - In Philip Clayton & Zachory Simpson (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 635--651.
Contributions from the Philosophy of Science.Robin Collins - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 328-344.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-03

Downloads
62 (#254,871)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references