In the Name of the Father: The Elizabethan Response to Recusancy by Married Catholic Women, 1559–1586 [Book Review]

Feminist Legal Studies 15 (3):307-328 (2007)

Abstract
The extraction of a pecuniary penalty for the recusancy of married women was a heavily contested issue in the Parliament of Elizabeth. Under the rules of coverture, married women controlled no property. It was thus ineffective to fine them, for they were unable to pay the penalty. As a result, the government attempted to hold husbands responsible for the penalties of their wives through the use of recognizances under the auspices of the Commissions for Causes Ecclesiastical, a prerogative court. Research into the York Commission’s use of recognizances indicated that it had indeed been possible legitimately and legally to obtain a pecuniary penalty for the recusancy of a married woman by the 1570s. This was generally believed to have been legally impossible until they became obtainable by statute in 1593. Detailed examination of the records of the Commission indicates clearly that the depiction in the scholarly literature of the levying of these penalties as somehow improper or even illegal is erroneous. These forfeitures might have seemed irregular, but were indeed legitimate and obtained by proper and legal means in the context of contemporary standards of authority and control, both governmental and familial. This study demonstrates how respect for the standards of coverture, patriarchy, and marital obligations incorporated in the use of the recognizance provided a highly effective and legal means to penalise and correct both recusant wives and their husbands
Keywords Catholic recusancy  coverture  early modern England  husbands and wives  patriarchy  punishment  law and governance  legality  recognizances
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10691-007-9063-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,204
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Catholic Laity in Elizabethan England: 1558-1603.William R. Trimble - 1964 - British Journal of Educational Studies 13 (1):116-116.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Feminism in Theistic Humanism.Maduabuchi Dukor - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 28:63-76.
Mass Pre-Embryo Adoption.Francesco Demartis - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (1):101-103.
Ciudadanía, familia Y mujer inmigrante víctima de violencia de género.Mercedes Soto Moya - 2008 - Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 42:177-198.
Argument. Why Should We Study Everyday Lives of Catholic Women.Mihai Lucaciu - 2003 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 2 (6):108-116.
Family Planning in Isparta, Turkey.F. Ozcan - 1997 - Journal of Biosocial Science 29 (4):509-510.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-24

Total views
6 ( #924,757 of 2,253,752 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #1,027,528 of 2,253,752 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature