Authors
Rik Peels
VU University Amsterdam
Abstract
I argue that scientism in general is best understood as the thesis that the boundaries of the natural sciences should be expanded in order to include academic disciplines or realms of life that are widely considered not to belong to the realm of science. However, every adherent and critic of scientism should make clear which of the many varieties of scientism she adheres to or criticizes. In doing so, she should specify whether she is talking about (a) academic or universal scientism, (b) reductive, methodological, epistemological, ontological, moral, or existential, scientism, (c) full or partial scientism, (d) strong or weak scientism, and (e) in the case of moral and existential scientism: replacement or illusion scientism. The strongest version of scientism one could defend is a conjunction of the following theses: strong full epistemological scientism, strong full ontological scientism, strong full Illusion-moral scientism, strong Illusion-existential scientism, and strong full reductive scientism. After a detailed discussion of each of the main varieties of scientism and their interrelations, the paper provides a conceptual map, consisting of two figures, which displays the main varieties of scientism and the relations that obtain between them, primarily, those of implication and mutual exclusion.
Keywords Conceptual Map  Science  Scientism
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,579
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Action in Perception.Alva Noë - 2005 - MIT Press.
The Structure of Empirical Knowledge.Laurence BonJour - 1985 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
The Nature of Necessity.Alvin Plantinga - 1974 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.

View all 116 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Empirical Case Against Introspection.Rik Peels - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (9):2461-2485.
Why Scientific Knowledge Is Still the Best.Moti Mizrahi - 2018 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7 (9):18-32.
Physicalism, Not Scientism.Alyssa Ney - forthcoming - In Jeroen de Ridder, Rik Peels & Rene van Woudenberg (eds.), Scientism: Prospects and Problems. Oxford University Press.
Science and Scientism in Popular Science Writing.Jeroen De Ridder - 2014 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3 (12):23–39.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Some Logical Problems for Scientism.Christopher M. Brown - 2011 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 85:189-200.
What is Scientism?Mikael Stenmark - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (1):15-32.
On Realism, Relativism, and Putnam.Hugo Meynell - 1995 - International Philosophical Quarterly 35 (3):331-342.
Odmiany scjentyzmu.Witold Strawiński - 1999 - Filozofia Nauki 1.
Scientism, Deconstruction, and Nihilism.Nicholas Capaldi - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (4):563-575.
Heidegger on Kant on the Alternative to the Scientism of the Enlightenment.Richard Mcdonough - 1997 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 28 (3):236-254.
Scientism and Anti-Scientism.Jerzy Kmita - 1986 - In Piotr Buczkowski & Andrzej Klawiter (eds.), Theories of Ideology and Ideology of Theories. Rodopi.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-05-17

Total views
172 ( #63,741 of 2,461,981 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #119,213 of 2,461,981 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes