Is the Market Perceived to be Civilizing or Destructive? Scientists’ Universalism Values and Their Attitudes Towards Patents
Journal of Business Ethics 170 (2):253-267 (2021)
AbstractIs the market civilizing or destructive? The increased salience of science commercialization is forcing scientists to address this question. Benefiting from the sociology of morality literature’s increased attention to specific kinds of morality and engaging with economic sociology’s moral markets literature, we generate competing hypotheses about scientists’ value-driven attitudes toward patenting. The Civilizing Market thesis suggests scientists who prioritize universalism will tend to support patenting. The Destructive Market thesis, by contrast, suggests universalism will be correlated with opposition to patenting. We analyze survey data from biologists and physicists nested within academic organizations, which are nested within the following regions: France, Hong Kong, India, Italy, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, and the USA. Employing multilevel analysis, we find correlational evidence to support the Destructive Market thesis. Universalism is associated with anti-patenting attitudes, suggesting scientists expect patenting to have deleterious effects on science and society. We end with a discussion of this article’s implications for the moral markets literature, sociology of morality and business ethics.
Similar books and articles
The Moral Limits of the Market: Science Commercialization and Religious Traditions.Jared L. Peifer, David R. Johnson & Elaine Howard Ecklund - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 157 (1):183-197.
DNA patents and scientific discovery and innovation: Assessing benefits and risks.David B. Resnik - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (1):29-62.
An analysis of moral issues affecting patenting inventions in the life sciences: A european perspective.R. Stephen Crespi - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (2):157-180.
Patenting human genes: Chinese academic articles’ portrayal of gene patents.Li Du - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):29.
Patenting and the Gender Gap: Should Women Be Encouraged to Patent More?Inmaculada Melo-Martín - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):491-504.
Patenting and the Gender Gap: Should Women Be Encouraged to Patent More? [REVIEW]Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):491-504.
From a Means to an End: Patenting in the 1999 Danish ‘Act on Inventions’ and its Effect on Research Practice.Nadja Sejersen & Janus Hansen - 2018 - Minerva 56 (3):261-281.
Moral Markets: The Critical Role of Values in the Economy.Paul J. Zak (ed.) - 2008 - Princeton University Press.
The Idea of Patents vs. the Idea of University.Thana Cristina de Campos - 2015 - The New Bioethics 21 (2):164-176.
Pharmaceutical patenting and the transformation of American medical ethics.Joseph M. Gabriel - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Science 49 (4):577-600.
Patenting and licensing of university research: promoting innovation or undermining academic values?Sigrid Sterckx - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (1):45-64.
Scientists’ attitudes on science and values: Case studies and survey methods in philosophy of science.Daniel Steel, Chad Gonnerman & Michael O'Rourke - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 63:22-30.
Exclusion by inclusion? On difficulties with regard to an effective ethical assessment of patenting in the field of agricultural bio-technology.Christoph Baumgartner - 2006 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (6):521-539.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Opening Constructive Dialogues Between Business Ethics Research and the Sociology of Morality: Introduction to the Thematic Symposium.Masoud Shadnam, Andrey Bykov & Ajnesh Prasad - 2021 - Journal of Business Ethics 170 (2):201-211.
References found in this work
The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations.Robert King Merton - 1973 - University of Chicago Press.
Mapping the moral domain.Jesse Graham, Brian A. Nosek, Jonathan Haidt, Ravi Iyer, Spassena Koleva & Peter H. Ditto - 2011 - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101 (2):366-385.