Dialogue 39 (3):605-607 (2000)

Abstract
In the past couple of decades, interest in the philosophy of language has, according to the introduction written by Zoltan Szabó for this volume, cooled somewhat. This is because pursuit of many of the philosophical issues that the study of language had set out to solve in the first place has developed into not so much the study of language, but, rather, of mind, and adjacent areas of philosophy. As Tyler Burge has put it, “Many philosophers felt that the philosophy of language had done its job.” This volume attempts to illuminate the positive side of these developments for the philosophical study of language. Szabó says, “The scientific results are interesting on their own, their relevance to the philosophical questions remains clear”. This, then, puts philosophy of language on a new footing, where, “Freed from the responsibility of ultimately answering all philosophical questions, philosophers of language were free to confess an interest in language per se”. The stated purpose of the volume is to present the reader with a variety of representative papers which “exemplify the current reorientation of philosophy of language,” which Szabó characterizes as a joint linguistic and philosophical investigation into “the syntax and semantics of various natural language constructions.”
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0012-2173
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,554
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

([How/Why]) Does Linguistics Matter to Philosophy?Francis Jeffry Pelletier - 1977 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 15 (3):393-426.
Is Compositionality Formally Vacuous?Ali Kazmi & Francis Jeffry Pelletier - 1998 - Linguistics and Philosophy 21 (6):629-633.
Linguistics is Not a Good Model for Philosophy.Michael R. Depaul - 2000 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (S1):113-120.
Linguistics in Philosophy.R. J. B. - 1968 - Review of Metaphysics 21 (4):757-757.
Rule-Following and Cognitive Linguistics.James Page - 1998 - Southwest Philosophy Review 14 (1):195-200.
Rethinking Linguistics.Hayley G. Davis - 2003 - Routledgecurzon.
Linguistics and Literary Theory. [REVIEW]M. R. C. - 1969 - Review of Metaphysics 22 (4):767-768.
The Politics of Linguistics.Justin Leiber - 1989 - Review of Metaphysics 42 (3):633-634.
Moral Philosophy and Linguistics.Gilbert Harman - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1:107-115.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-09-26

Total views
159 ( #54,788 of 2,331,149 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #194,946 of 2,331,149 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes