Cognition 124 (1):101-106 (2012)

Abstract
Recent evidence suggests that people are highly efficient at detecting conflicting outputs produced by competing intuitive and analytic reasoning processes. Specifically, De Neys and Glumicic demonstrated that participants reason longer about problems that are characterized by conflict between stereotypical personality descriptions and base-rate probabilities of group membership. However, this finding comes from problems involving probabilities much more extreme than those used in traditional studies of base-rate neglect. To test the degree to which these findings depend on such extreme probabilities, we varied base-rate probabilities over five experiments and compared participants’ response time for conflict problems with non-conflict problems. Longer response times for stereotypical responses to conflict versus non-conflict problems were found only in the presence of extreme probabilities. Our results suggest that humans may not be consistently efficient at detecting conflicts during reasoning
Keywords Base-rate neglect  Biases  Conflict detection  Dual-process theory  Heuristics  Reasoning
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.004
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,480
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On the Psychology of Prediction.Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky - 1973 - Psychological Review 80 (4):237-251.
The Duality of Mind: An Historical Perspective.Keith Frankish & Jsbt Evans - 2009 - In Keith Frankish & Jonathan St B. T. Evans (eds.), In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Good Reasoning on the Toulmin Model.David Hitchcock - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):373-391.
Descartes on Passion Reformation.Basileios Kroustallis - 2005 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (3):312-323.
Reasoning to Obligation.Barbara Herman - 2006 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 49 (1):44 – 61.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-18

Total views
35 ( #273,881 of 2,330,639 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #394,426 of 2,330,639 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes