Epiphenomenalism and Machines: A Discussion of Van Rooijen's Critique of Popper

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Epiphenomenalism  Machine  Science  Van Rooijen, J
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/40.3.404
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,674
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Van Rooijen Jeroen (1987). Interactionism and Evolution: A Critique of Popper. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (1):87-92.
Tom Settle (1989). Van Rooijen and Mayr Versus Popper: Is the Universe Causally Closed? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (3):389-403.
Herman C. D. G. De Regt (2006). To Believe in Belief Popper and Van Fraassen on Scientific Realism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (1):21 - 39.
Frank Jackson (1980). Interactionism Revived? Philosophy of Social Science 10 (September):316-23.
Volker Gadenne (2006). In Defence of Qualia-Epiphenomenalism. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (1-2):101-114.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

114 ( #38,934 of 1,903,102 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #446,023 of 1,903,102 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.