Harold Innis, Roberta Kevelson, and the Bias of Legal Communications
Semiotics:185-192 (2003)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Dissent and the Anarchic in Legal Counter-Culture: A Peircean View.Roberta Kevelson - 2002 - Ratio Juris 15 (1):16-25.
How's of why's and why's of how's: Relation of method and cause in inquiry.Roberta Kevelson - 1988 - Synthese 74 (1):91 - 106.
Book Reviews : Empire and Communications. By Harold A. Innis. Illustrated, edited and with special introductions and an afterward by David Godfrey. Victoria: Press Porcepic, 1986. Pp. 184. $14.95 (paper. [REVIEW]Richard Collins - 1989 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 19 (2):217-219.
C. S. Peirce's Speculative Rhetoric.Roberta Kevelson - 1984 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 17 (1):16 - 29.
Technics and the bias of perception.Robert E. Innis - 1984 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 10 (1):67-89.
Technologizing of the word: Toward a theoretical and ethical understanding.George A. Gladney - 1991 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 6 (2):93 – 105.
Peirce's "Dialogism, Continuous Predicate", and Legal Reasoning.Koberta Kevelson - 1982 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 18 (2):159 - 176.
Explorations on the Notion of Legal Tolerance.Eliana Herrera-Vega - 2012 - World Futures 68 (4-5):280 - 295.
The “bias” bias in social psychology: Adaptive when and how?James Friedrich - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):335-336.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-09-18
Downloads
25 (#465,310)
6 months
1 (#448,894)
2012-09-18
Downloads
25 (#465,310)
6 months
1 (#448,894)
Historical graph of downloads
