Is Organismic Fitness at the Basis of Evolutionary Theory?

Philosophy of Science 82 (5):1081-1091 (2015)

Authors
Charles H. Pence
Université Catholique de Louvain
Abstract
Fitness is a central theoretical concept in evolutionary theory. Despite its importance, much debate has occurred over how to conceptualize and formalize fitness. One point of debate concerns the roles of organismic and trait fitness. In a recent addition to this debate, Elliott Sober argues that trait fitness is the central fitness concept, and that organismic fitness is of little value. In this paper, by contrast, we argue that it is organismic fitness that lies at the bases of both the conceptual role of fitness, as well as its role as a measure of evolutionary dynamics.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2014, 2015
DOI 10.1086/683442
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 49,128
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On the Origin of Species.Charles Darwin - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
A New Foundation for the Propensity Interpretation of Fitness.Charles Pence & Grant Ramsey - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (4):851-881.
The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness.Susan K. Mills & John H. Beatty - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (2):263-286.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Can Fitness Differences Be a Cause of Evolution?Grant Ramsey - 2013 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 5 (20130604).
The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness.Susan K. Mills & John H. Beatty - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (2):263-286.
A Defense of Propensity Interpretations of Fitness.Robert C. Richardson & Richard M. Burian - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:349 - 362.
Fitness and Propensity’s Annulment?Marshall Abrams - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (1):115-130.
Trait Fitness is Not a Propensity, but Fitness Variation Is.Elliott Sober - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (3):336-341.
The Confusions of Fitness.André Ariew & R. C. Lewontin - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):347-363.
The Evolution of Theoretically Useful Traits.Rowland Stout - 1998 - Biology and Philosophy 13 (4):529-540.
Levels, Time and Fitness in Evolutionary Transitions in Individuality.Pierrick Bourrat - 2015 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 7 (20150505).
On Fitness.Costas B. Krimbas - 2004 - Biology and Philosophy 19 (2):185-203.
Fitness as a Function.Henry Byerly - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:494 - 501.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-09-07

Total views
28 ( #342,943 of 2,311,514 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #517,761 of 2,311,514 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature