Naturalism, Evidence and Creationism: The Case of Phillip Johnson [Book Review]

Biology and Philosophy 11 (4):543-559 (1996)

Abstract
Phillip Johnson claims that Creationism is a better explanation of the existence and characteristics of biological species than is evolutionary theory. He argues that the only reason biologists do not recognize that Creationist's negative arguments against Darwinism have proven this is that they are wedded to a biased ideological philosophy —Naturalism — which dogmatically denies the possibility of an intervening creative god. However,Johnson fails to distinguish Ontological Naturalism from Methodological Naturalism. Science makes use of the latter and I show how it is not dogmatic but follows from sound requirements for empirical evidential testing. Furthermore, Johnson has no serious alternative type of positive evidence to offer for Creationism, and purely negative argumentation, despite his attempt to legitimate it, will not suffice.
Keywords Creationism  evidence  evolution  naturalism  Phillip Johnson  scientific methodology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00138334
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,455
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism.Philip Kitcher & Marcel C. La Follette - 1984 - Journal of the History of Biology 17 (1):147-148.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Postmodern Sin of Intelligent Design Creationism.Robert T. Pennock - 2010 - Science & Education 19 (6-8):757-778.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Hiddenness Argument Revisited.J. L. Schellenberg - 2005 - Religious Studies 41 (3):287-303.
How Bad Is Rape?H. E. Baber - 1987 - Hypatia 2 (2):125-138.
Shifting Frames: From Divided to Distributed Psychologies of Scientific Agents.Peter J. Taylor - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:304-310.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
240 ( #27,934 of 2,272,246 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #36,918 of 2,272,246 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature