Of stirps and chromosomes: Generality through detail

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 94 (C):177-190 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One claim found in the received historiography of the biometrical school (comprised primarily of Francis Galton, Karl Pearson, and W. F. R. Weldon) is that one of the biometricians' great flaws was their inability to look past their population-focused, statistical, gradualist understanding of evolutionary change – which led, in part, to their ignoring developments in cellular biology around 1900. I will argue, on the contrary, that the work of the biometricians was, from its earliest days, fundamentally concerned with connections between statistical patterns of inheritance and the underlying cellular features that gave rise to them. Such work remained current with contemporary knowledge of chromosomes, cytology, and development; in this article, I explore the first case. The biometricians were thus well positioned to understand the relationship between the patterns of Mendelian inheritance and the statistical distributions with which they primarily occupied themselves. Ignorance of this connection, then, is not the reason why they rejected Mendelism. Further, both Galton and Weldon – though each in their own unique way – decided to turn to biological detail as a way to better justify the generality of their statistical approaches to heredity. Perhaps paradoxically, then, for these biometricians, detail offered an approach to theoretical generality.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

‘‘Describing our whole experience’’: The statistical philosophies of W. F. R. Weldon and Karl Pearson.Charles H. Pence - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (4):475-485.
Francis Galton’s regression towards mediocrity and the stability of types.Adam Krashniak & Ehud Lamm - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 81 (C):6-19.
Modelling populations: Pearson and Fisher on mendelism and biometry.Margaret Morrison - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (1):39-68.
The Early History of Chance in Evolution.Charles H. Pence - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 50:48-58.
The "Evolutionary Synthesis" of George Udny Yule.James G. Tabery - 2003 - Journal of the History of Biology 37 (1):73-101.
The curious case of blending inheritance.Theodore M. Porter - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 46 (1):125-132.
Physics in the Galtonian sciences of heredity.Gregory Radick - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (2):129-138.
Conflicts in human progress: sexual selection and the Fisherian ‘runaway’.Mary M. Hartley - 1994 - British Journal for the History of Science 27 (2):177-196.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-16

Downloads
428 (#59,418)

6 months
121 (#42,884)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Charles H. Pence
Université Catholique de Louvain

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Idealization and the Aims of Science.Angela Potochnik - 2017 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
The Scientific Image.William Demopoulos & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (4):603.
Studies in the logic of explanation.Carl Gustav Hempel & Paul Oppenheim - 1948 - Philosophy of Science 15 (2):135-175.
The taming of chance.Ian Hacking - 1990 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 36 references / Add more references