Persuasion, not coercion or incentivisation, is the best means of promoting COVID-19 vaccination

Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (10):709-711 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Savulescu argues that it may be ethically acceptable for governments to require citizens be vaccinated against COVID-19. He also recommends that governments consider providing monetary or in-kind incentives to citizens to increase vaccination rates. In this response, we argue against mandatory vaccination and vaccine incentivisation, and instead suggest that targeted public health messaging and a greater responsiveness to the concerns of vaccine-hesitant individuals would be the best strategy to address low vaccination rates.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,244

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

COVID-19 Vaccines and the Virtues.Konrad V. Boyneburgk & Francesca Bellazzi - 2022 - Public Health Ethics 15 (3):209-219.
Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?Julian Savulescu - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (2):78-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-28

Downloads
62 (#274,923)

6 months
16 (#272,133)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Susan Pennings
Australian National University
Xavier Symons
Harvard University

References found in this work

Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?Julian Savulescu - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (2):78-85.

Add more references