Patients' preferences shed light on the murky world of guideline‐based medicine

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (1):154-159 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00701.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Is There a Tension Between Doctors' Duty of Care and Evidence-Based Medicine?Wendy A. Rogers - 2002 - Health Care Analysis 10 (3):277-287.
Law, Ethics, and the Patient Preference Predictor.R. Dresser - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (2):178-186.
Trust but Verify: The Interactive Effects of Trust and Autonomy Preferences on Health Outcomes. [REVIEW]Yin-Yang Lee & Julia L. Lin - 2009 - Health Care Analysis 17 (3):244-260.
Patients' preferences for receiving clinical information and participating in decision-making in Iran.F. Asghari, A. Mirzazadeh & A. Fotouhi - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):348-352.
Patient preferences for physician persuasion strategies.Dan O'Hair - 1986 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (2).
Information requisition is the core of guideline‐based medical care: which information is needed for whom?Theresia Gschwandtner, Katharina Kaiser & Silvia Miksch - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (4):713-721.
Code status discussions and goals of care among hospitalised adults.L. C. Kaldjian, Z. D. Erekson, T. H. Haberle, A. E. Curtis, L. A. Shinkunas, K. T. Cannon & V. L. Forman-Hoffman - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (6):338-342.
The compensation of patients injured in clinical trials.J. M. Barton, M. S. Macmillan & L. Sawyer - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (3):166-169.
Individual autonomy and the double-blind controlled experiment: The case of desperate volunteers.N. Waller Bruce - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (1).
The scope for the involvement of patients in their consultations with health professionals: rights, responsibilities and preferences of patients.S. Buetow - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (4):243-247.
“Compliance” to “Concordance”: A Critical View. [REVIEW]Judy Z. Segal - 2007 - Journal of Medical Humanities 28 (2):81-96.
Do we need some large, simple randomized trials in medicine?John Worrall - 2009 - Epsa.
Use of a Patient Preference Predictor to Help Make Medical Decisions for Incapacitated Patients.A. Rid & D. Wendler - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (2):104-129.
Reconsidering Patient Participation in Guideline Development.Hester M. van de Bovenkamp & Margo J. Trappenburg - 2009 - Health Care Analysis 17 (3):198.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
9 (#1,181,695)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The DSM, Big Pharma, and Clinical Practice Guidelines: Protecting Patient Autonomy and Informed Consent. Cosgrove - 2011 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (1):11-25.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references