European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8 (3):435-454 (2017)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
We argue that the economy of nature constitutes an invocation of structure in the biological sciences, one largely missed by philosophers of biology despite the turn in recent years toward structural explanations throughout the philosophy of science. We trace a portion of the history of this concept, beginning with the theologically and economically grounded work of Linnaeus, moving through Darwin’s adaptation of the economy of nature and its reconstitution in genetic terms during the first decades of the Modern Synthesis. What this historical case study reveals, we argue, is a window into the shifting landscape of the explanatory and ontic uses of structural concepts. In Linnaeus, the economy of nature has both ontic and explanatory import; in Darwin the ontic and explanatory aspects start to come apart ; and finally, in the Modern Synthesis, the economy of nature is replaced by the conceptual toolkit of population genetics, the structural elements of which are nearly entirely explanatory. Having traced a historical trajectory of structural concepts that moves from an ontic formulation to an increasingly explanatory one, we conclude by outlining some insights for structural realism.
|
Keywords | economy of nature Carl Linnaeus Charles Darwin Sewall Wright Ernst Mayr ecology Modern Synthesis population genetics structural realism |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2017, 2018 |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s13194-017-0194-0 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized.James Ladyman & Don Ross - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
View all 46 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Whatever Happened to Reversion?Charles H. Pence - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 92:97-108.
Similar books and articles
“A Great Complication of Circumstances” – Darwin and the Economy of Nature.Trevor Pearce - 2010 - Journal of the History of Biology 43 (3):493-528.
The Nature of Darwin’s Support for the Theory of Natural Selection.Elisabeth A. Lloyd - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (1):112-129.
Quantization as a Guide to Ontic Structure.Karim P. Y. Thébault - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (1):89-114.
Do Objects Depend on Structures?Johanna Wolff - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (3):607-625.
Explanatory Unification and the Early Synthesis.Anya Plutynski - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (3):595-609.
Evolutionary Chance Mutation: A Defense of the Modern Synthesis' Consensus View.Francesca Merlin - 2010 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 2 (20130604).
Is There a Compelling Argument for Ontic Structural Realism?Matteo Morganti - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (5):1165-1176.
Darwin and Political Economy: The Connection Reconsidered.Scott Gordon - 1989 - Journal of the History of Biology 22 (3):437-459.
The Modern Synthesis and Lewontin's Critique of Sociobiology.I. I. I. Holcomb - 1988 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 10 (2):315 - 341.
Complexities in Genome Structure and Evolution.Michael Purugganan - 2010 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Gerd Muller (eds.), Evolution – the Extended Synthesis. MIT Press. pp. 117--134.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-12-06
Total views
46 ( #244,128 of 2,498,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,180 of 2,498,932 )
2017-12-06
Total views
46 ( #244,128 of 2,498,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,180 of 2,498,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads