The explanatory power of local miracle compatibilism

Philosophical Studies 156 (2):249-266 (2010)
Abstract
Local miracle compatibilists claim that we are sometimes able to do otherwise than we actually do, even if causal determinism obtains. When we can do otherwise, it will often be true that if we were to do otherwise, then an actual law of nature would not have been a law of nature. Nevertheless, it is a compatibilist principle that we cannot do anything that would be or cause an event that violates the laws of nature. Carl Ginet challenges this nomological principle, arguing that it is not always capable of explaining our inability to do otherwise. In response to this challenge, I point out that this principle is part of a defense against the charge that local miracle compatibilists are committed to outlandish claims. Thus it is not surprising that the principle, by itself, will often fail to explain our inability to do otherwise. I then suggest that in many situations in which we are unable to do otherwise, this can be explained by the compatibilist’s analysis of ability, or his criteria for the truth of ability claims. Thus, the failure of his nomological principle to explain the falsity of certain ability claims is no strike against local miracle compatibilism
Keywords Free will  Determinism  Compatibilism  Local miracle compatibilism  Ability
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-010-9594-0
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,692
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Philosophical Papers Vol. II.Lewis David - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
An Essay on Free Will.van Inwagen Peter - 1983 - Oxford University Press.
Are We Free to Break the Laws?David Lewis - 1981 - Theoria 47 (3):113-21.
Counterfactuals and Temporal Direction.Jonathan Bennett - 1984 - Philosophical Review 93 (1):57-91.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Contrariety of Compatibilist Positions.Saul Smilansky - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:293-309.
A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'.Chris Slupik - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
Dispositional Abilities.Ann Whittle - 2010 - Philosophers' Imprint 10 (12).
Miracles and Violations.Timothy Pritchard - 2010 - Religious Studies 47 (1):41-58.
Ability and Cognition: A Defense of Compatibilism.Tomis Kapitan - 1991 - Philosophical Studies 63 (August):231-43.
Local Miracle Compatibilism.Helen Beebee - 2003 - Noûs 37 (2):258-277.
A Defense of Local Miracle Compatibilism.Peter A. Graham - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (1):65 - 82.
Defending Lewis's Local Miracle Compatibilism.S. Oakley - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 130 (2):337-349.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-07-19

Total downloads

58 ( #89,319 of 2,158,485 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #64,770 of 2,158,485 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums